Les tensions entre la sécurité intérieure et le droits civils suite aux attentats du 11 septembre
Mots-clés :
États-Unis, Sécurité intérieure, Terrorisme, George W. Bush, Droits civilsRésumé
Les tensions entre les institutions, les politiques de sécurité et les droits civils de la population constituent la dy-namique politique des démocraties. Cet article examine une partie de la bibliographie académique qui a abordé les tensions entre droits civils et politiques antiterroristes au cours des deux mandats du président George W. Bush, en vue d’organiser une systématisation des types d’analyse sur le sujet. Quatre groupes différents de travaux ont été analysés: ceux qui adoptent une des positions polarisées issues de la tension entre sécurité et droits civils; ceux qui adoptent la perspective des politiques publiques; ceux qui analysent le problème d’un point de vue constitutionnel; et ceux qui se lancent dans une voie positiviste et plus analytique pour aborder le rapport entre la sécurité intérieure et les droits civils après le 11 septembre.
Téléchargements
Références
Alarmistas versus complacentes
ASHCROFT, John (2005). “Preserving life and liberty”. In: BAKER, Thomas E.; STACK Jr., John F. (orgs.). At wa with civil rights and civil liberties. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
BROWN, Cynthia (2003). Lost liberties: Ashcroft and the assault on personal freedom. New York: The New Press.
CHANG, Nancy (2002). Silencing political dissent: how post-September 11 anti-terrorism measures threaten our civil liberties. Canada: A Seven Stories Press First Edition.
LEONE, Richard C. (2003). The war on our freedoms: civil liberties in an age of terrorism. New York: BBS Public Affairs.
YOO, John (2005). The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and foreign affairs after 9/11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
_____. (2006). War by other means: an insider’s account of the war on terror. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press. Analisando e melhorando as políticas de segurança
CRISHTI, M. A. et al. (2003). America’s security, civil liberties and national unity after September 11. Washington: Migration Policy Institute (MPI).
HEYMANN, P.; KAYYEM, J. (2005). Protecting liberty in an Age of Terror. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
SCHULHOFER, Stephen (2002). The enemy within: intelligence gathering, law enforcement and civil liberties in the
wake of September 11. Washington: The Century Foundation Press.
O debate constitucional
ACKERMAN, Bruce (2006). Before the next: preserving civil liberties in an age of terrorism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
COLE, D.; DEMPSEY, J. (2005). Terrorism and the Constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. 3. ed. New York: The New Press.
DYZENHAUS, D. (2005). “The state of emergency in legal theory”. In: RAMRAJ, Victor V.; HOR, Michael;
ROACH, Kent (orgs.). Global anti-terrorism law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GRABER, Mark A. (2005). “Counter-stories: maintaining and expanding civil liberties in wartime”. In: TUSHNET, Mark (org.). Constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Durham: Duke University Press.
GROSS, Oren (2003). “Chaos and rules: should responses to violent crises always be constitutional?”. Yale Law Journal, n. 112, p. 1011-1134.
_____. (2005). “Stability and flexibility: a dicey business”. In: RAMRAJ, Victor V.; HOR, Michael; ROACH, Kent (orgs.). Global anti-terrorism law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISSACHARO, S.; PILDES, R. H. (2005). “Between civil libertarianism and executive unilateralism: an institutional process approach to rights during wartime”. In: TUSHNET, Mark (org.). Constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Durham: Duke University Press.
LOBEL, Jules (2005). “The war on terrorism and civil liberties”. In: BAKER, Thomas E.; STACK Jr., John F. (orgs.). At war with civil rights and civil liberties. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
PFIFFNER, James P. (2008). Power play: the Bush presidency and the Constitution. Washington: Brooking Institution Press.
TUSHNET, Mark (2006). Constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Durham: Duke University Press. As análises positivistas
BANKS, W. C. (2005). “United States responses to September 11”. In: RAMRAJ, Victor V.; HOR, Michael;
ROACH, Kent (orgs.). Global anti-terrorism law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LEVIN, Brian (2007). “Trials for terrorists: the shifting legal landscape of the post-9/11 era”. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, v. 23, n. 2, p. 140-141.
LUBAN, David (2005). “The war on terrorism and the end of human rights”. In: TUSHNET, Mark (org.). Constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Durham: Duke University Press.
KLOSEK, J. (2007). The war on privacy. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
MORAN, Jon (2005). “State power in the war on terror: a comparative analysis of the UK and USA”. Crime, Law & Social Change, n. 44, p. 335-359.
SIDEL, Mark (2007). More secure, less free?: antiterrorism policy and civil liberties after September 11. Michigan: University Michigan Press. Literatura de apoio
CINTRA, A. O. (2007). “Presidencialismo e parlamentarismo: são importantes as instituições?”. In: AVELAR, Lucia; CINTRA, Antonio Octávio (orgs.). Sistema político brasileiro: uma introdução. 2. ed. São Paulo: Fundação Konrad Adenauer; Ed. Unesp.
KATZ, Richard S. (2007). Political institutions in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TOINET, Marie-France (1994). El sistema político de los Estados Unidos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
