Redes e inovação
uma análise bibliométrica do campo
Keywords:
innovation, networks, bibliometric analysis, innovation studiesAbstract
This is a systematic view on how different perspectives on networks and innovation are related within the fields of study. Innovation can be studied under various network approaches, all of which focus on the links between actors and their role in innovation. Based on this scope, we conducted a bibliometric literature analysis on the topic and main concepts associated with the approaches to understand the intellectual interactions and structural connections between the research field constituents. Results point to a clear division in the field, with different relations between the main investigated themes, the areas of study and the references. Based on current academic production, the main theoretical implication is a predominance of publications associated with interorganizational networks and applied social sciences, with little collaboration between the main authors of different approaches despite the great number of common topics. Thus, this research contributed to the mapping of the field of study, its division by approaches, themes and disciplinary areas, deepening the knowledge on the subject and its structuring in academia.
Downloads
References
AKRICH, M. et al. The key to success in innovation part I: the art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 6, n. 2; p. 187-206, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919602000550
BORGATTI, S. P. et al. Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, v. 323, n. 5916, p. 892-895, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821.
BRASIL JR., A.; CARVALHO, L. Por dentro das Ciências Humanas: um mapeamento semântico da área via base SciELO-Brasil (2002-2019). Revista de Humanidades Digitales, v. 5, p. 149-183, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5944/rhd.vol.5.2020.27687.
CALLON, M. The state and technical innovation: a case study of the electrical vehicle in France. Research Policy, v. 9, n. 4: p. 358-376, 1980.
DAGNINO, G. B. et al. Interorganizational network and innovation: a bibliometric study and proposed research agenda. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 30, n. ¾, p. 354-377, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2013-0032.
FAGERBERG, J.; FOSAAS, M.; SAPPRASERT, K. Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1132-1153, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
GEELS, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 8-9, p. 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
GEELS, F. W. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 39, p. 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
GRANOVETTER, M. S. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, v. 78, n. 6, p. 1360-1380, 1973. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
JULIEN, P.-A. Empreendedorismo regional e economia do conhecimento. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
KNOX, H.; SAVAGE, M.; HARVEY, P. Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, v. 35, n.1, p. 113-140, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465899.
