Technologies de gouvernement, famille et humanitarisme dans un monde globalisé
Mots-clés :
Technologies de gouvernement, Multi nationalisme, Humanitarisme, Adoption, Nouveaux modèles familiauxRésumé
Cet article examine les récentes analyses anthropologiques sur l’adoption transnationale d’enfants. Il tente de démon-trer qu’elles enrichissent les débats non seulement sur la famille, la filiation et la parenté, mais aussi sur l’inégalité et la violence, les technologies de gouvernement dans un monde globalisé et sur les subjectivités variables face à des dynamiques multiculturelles. Nous décrivons de quelle façon les inquiétudes dans ce domaine se sont développées au cours des vingt dernières années, en passant des sociétés traditionnelles aux métropoles contemporaines, des pratiques familiales informelles aux normes légales nationales et internationales, des analyses qui mettent en avant “la culture” à celles qui mettent en valeur la biopolitique et le contexte postcolonial. Finalement, en prenant comme interlocuteurs des managers et des auteurs de politiques publiques, nous tentons de démontrer comment un grand nombre de cher-cheurs se sont déplacés d’un objectif strictement disciplinaire vers un autre fondé sur de grandes alliances inspirées dans l’engagement politique et qui considère les questions d’inégalité autant que les questions de diversité.
Téléchargements
Références
ABREU, Domingo (2002). No bico da cegonha: por uma sociologia da adoção no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.
______. (2009). “Baby-bearing storks: Brazilian intermediaries in the adoption process”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press. p. 138-153.
ANAGNOST, A. (2000). “Scenes of misrecognition: maternal citizenship in the age of transnational adoption”. Positions: East Asia cultures critique, v. 8, n. 2, p. 389-421.
AYRES, Lygia S. M. (2008). Adoção: de menor a criança, de criança a filho. Curitiba: Juruá.
BARTHOLET, Elizabeth (1999). Nobody’s children: abuse and neglect, foster drift, and the adoption alternative. Boston: Beacan Press.
BORSHAY, Liem (2000). First person plural. Ho He Kus. New Jersey: Mu Films.
BRIGGS, Laura (2006). “Adopción transnacional: robo de criaturas, familias homoparentales y neoliberalismo”. Debate feminista, Ciudad de Mexico, v. 17, n. 33, p. 46-68.
_____. (2012). Somebody’s children: the politics of transracial and transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
BRIGGS, Laura; MARRE, Diana (2009). “Introduction: The circulation of children”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
CADORET, A. (1995). Parenté plurielle: anthropologie du placement familial. Paris: Harmattan.
CARDARELLO, Andréa Daniella Lamas (2007). Trafic légal d’enfants: la formation d’un mouvement de familles pauvres contre les politiques de l’adoption au Brésil. Thèse de doctorat, Département d’Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
_____. (2009). “The movement of the mothers of the courthouse square: ‘legal child trafficking’, adoption and poverty in Brazil”. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 140-161.
CARP, E. W. (1998). Family matters: secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
_____. (2004). Adoption politics: Bastard Nation & Ballot Initiative 58. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
CARROLL, V. (ed.) (1970). Adoption in Eastern Oceania. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
CARSTEN, J. (2000). “Introduction”. In: CARSTEN, J. (ed.). Cultures of relatedness. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
CARTWRIGHT, Lisa (2005). “Images of ‘waiting children’: spectatorship and pity in the representation of the
global social orphan in the 1900s”. In: VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/
London: Duke University Press.
COLEN, Shellee (1995). “‘Like a mother to them’: stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York”. In: GINSBURG, F. D.; RAPP, R. (eds.). Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 78-102.
COLLARD, Ch. (1996). “‘Nouer, dénouer le cordon ombilical’: illégitimité et adoption au Québec”. Gradhiva, Paris, n. 19, p. 53-62.
_____. (1999). Une famille, un village, une nation: la parenté dans Charlevoix, 1900-1960. Québec: Boréal.
_____. (2005).“Triste terrain de jeu: à propos de l’adoption internationale”. Gradhiva, Paris, n. 1, p. 209-224.
_____. (2009). “The transnational adoption of a related child in Québec, Canada”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press
COLLINS, Patricia Hill (1992). “Black women and motherhood”. In: THORNE, B.; YALOM, M. (orgs.). Rethinking the family: some feminist questions. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
COSTA, Maria Cecília Solheid (1988). Os filhos de coração: adoção em camadas médias brasileiras. Tese de doutorado, Museu Nacional, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro. (mimeo)
DEMIAN, Melissa (2004). “Transactions in rights, transactions in children: a view of adoption from Papua New Guinea”. In: BOWIE, F. (org.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
DEVILLARD, María José et al. (2001). Los niños españoles en la URSS (1937-1977). Barcelona: Ariel.
DI SILVIO, Rossana (2008). Parentele di confine: la pratica adottiva tra desiderio locale e mondo globale. Verona:
Ombre Corte
DUBINSKY, Karen (2010). Babies without borders: adoption and migration across the Americas. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press.
ESTRADA IGUÍNIZ, M. (2009). “Ejercicio de los roles parentales en un contexto de emigración entre México y
Estados Unidos”. Revista de Antropologia Social, Madrid, n. 18, p. 221-234.
FERREIRA, Mariana K. (2000). “De puro-sangue, meia-raça e lixo-branco: os internatos para índios e o sistema
penal nos Estados Unidos”. In: DEBERT, G. B.; GOLSTEIN, D. M. (orgs.). Políticas do corpo e o curso da vida. São Paulo: Ed. Sumaré.
FINE, Agnès (2009). “Des retrouvailles peu ordinaries”. In: MARTRE-MICALEFF, D. Mon enfant en terre lointains: une adoption ouverte. Toulouse: Ed. Privat.
FONSECA, Claudia (1985). “Valeur marchande, amour maternel, et survie: aspects de la circulation d’enfants dans un bidonville brésilien”. Les Annales ESC, Paris, v. 40, n. 5, p. 991-1022.
_____. (1995). Caminhos da adoção. São Paulo: Cortez.
_____. (2006a). “Uma virada imprevista: o ‘fim’ da adoção internacional no Brasil”. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, v. 49, n. 1, p. 41-66.
_____. (2006b). “Da circulação de crianças à adoção internacional: questões de pertencimento e posse”. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, n. 26, p. 11-44.
_____. (2007). “Desigualdades cerca y lejos: adopción internacional desde la perspectiva de las favelas brasileñas”. In: RODRÍGUEZ, Pablo; MANNARELLI, Maria Emma. Historia de la infancia en América Latina. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. p. 503-534.
_____. (2009a). “Transnational negotiations of the mechanisms of governance: regularizing child adoption”. Vibrant, Brasília, v. 6, n. 1, p. 8-36.
_____. (2009b). “Family belonging and class hierarchy: secrecy, rupture and inequality as seen through the narratives of Brazilian”. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 92-114.
_____. (2009c). “Homoparentalidade: novas luzes sobre o parentesco”. Revista de Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 16, n. 3, p. 743-768.
_____. (2010). “Profit, care and kinship? The de-kinning of birthmothers”. In: FONS, V.; PIELLA, A.; VALDES, M. (orgs.). Procreación, crianza y género: aproximaciones antropológicas a la parentalidad. Barcelona: PPU – Promociones y publicaciones universitarias.
_____. (2011). “The de-kinning of birthmothers – reflections on maternity and being human”. Vibrant (revista online
da Associação Brasileira de Antropologia), v. 8, n. 2, p. 307-339.
FONSECA, C. et al. (2012). “El ‘superior interés del menor’ revisitado”. Scripta Nova: Revista de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, Barcelona, v. XVI, n. 395 (número extraordinario).
GAILEY, Christine (1999). “Seeking ‘baby right’: race, class, and gender in US international adoption”. In:
RYGVOLD, A.-L.; DALEN, M.; SÆTERSDAL, B. (eds.). Mine, yours, ours and their. Oslo: University of Oslo Press.
GOODY, Esther (1982). Parenthood and social reproduction: fostering and occupational roles in West Africa. London: Cambridge University Press.
GRAU REBOLLO, Jorge (2010). “La circulación de menores desde una perspectiva transcultural”. In: FONS, V.;
PIELLA, A.; VALDES, M. (eds.). Procreación, crianza y género: aproximaciones antropológicas a la parentalidad. Barcelona: PPU – Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias,
HALBMAYER, Ernst (2004). “‘The one who feeds has the rights’: adoption and fostering of kin, affines and enemies among the Yukpa and other Carib-speaking Indians of lowland South America”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
HARRIS, M. Jonathan; OPPENHEIMER, Deborah (2000). Into the arms of strangers: stories of the kindertransport. New York: Bloomsbury.
HOELGAARD, S. (1998). “Cultural determinants of adoption policy: a Colombian case study”. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, Oxford, v. 12, n. 1, p. 202-401.
HÖGBACKA, R. (2010). “Transnational adoption and the exclusivity and inclusivity of families”. In: JALLINOJA,
R.; WIDMER, E. (eds). Families and kinship in contemporary Europe: rules and practices of relatedness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
HOWELL, S. (2004). The backpackers that come to stay: new challenges to Norwegian transnational adoptive families. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
_____. (2006). The kinning of foreigners: traditional adoption in a global perspective. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
_____. (2009a). “Adoption of the unrelated child: some challenges to the anthropological study of kinship”. Annual
Review of Anthropology, Palo Alto, n. 38, p. 149-166.
_____. (2009b). “Return journeys and the search for roots: contradictory values concerning identity”. In: MARRE,
D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
HUBINETTE, T. (2006). Comforting an orphaned nation: representations of international adoption and adopted
Koreans in Korean popular culture. Seoul: Jimoondang. ISS – International Social Service (2005). Evaluation of the practical operation of the Hague Convention of 9 May
on Protection of children and co-operation in respect of inter-country adoption (for the attention of the Special Commission invited in September 2005 by the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Convention). Disponível em: <http://www.iss-ssi.org/2009/assets/files/practices/evaluation%20hague%20convention.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2013.
JOHNSON, K. A. (2004). Wanting a daughter, needing a son: abandonment, adoption, and orphanage care in China. Saint Paul: Yeong & Yeong Book Company.
KENDALL, L. (2005). “Birth mothers and imaginary lives”. In: VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
KHABIBULLINA, L. (2009). “International adoption in Russia: ‘market’, ‘children for organs’, and ‘precious’ or ‘bad’ genes”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press. p. 174-189.
KIM, E. (2005). “Wedding citizenship and culture: Korean adoptees and the global family of Korea”. In:
VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
KOSACK, G. (2004). “Adopting a native child: an anthropologist’s personal involvement in the field”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
LALLEMAND, S. (1993). La circulation des enfants en société traditionnelle: prêt, don, échange. Paris: Harmattan.
LEBLIC, I. (2007). “Kanak identity, new citizenship building and reconciliation”. Journal de la Société des Océanistes, New Caledonia, n. 125, p. 271-282.
_____. (2009). “L’Arche de Zoé: la chronologie d’un naufrage humanitaire”. Anthropologie et Sociétés, Québec, v. 33, n. 1, p. 83-99.
LEFAUCHER, Nadine (2004). “The French “tradition” of anonymous birth: the lines of argument”. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Oxford, v. 18, n. 3, p. 319-342.
LEIFSEN, E. (2004). “Person, relation and value: the economy of circulating Ecuadorian children in international adoption”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
_____. (2006). Moralities and politics of belonging: governing female reproduction in 20th century Quito. Oslo: Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.
_____. (2009). “Adoption and the governing of child welfare in 20th century Quito”. The Journal of Latin Americanand Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 68-91.
LEINAWEAVER, J. (2008). The circulation of children: kinship, adoption, and morality in Andean Peru. Durham/ London: Duke University Press.
_____. (2009a). “Kinship into the Peruvian adoption office: reproducing families, producing the State”. The Journal
of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 44-67.
_____. (2009b). “The medicalization of adoption in and from Peru”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press. p. 190-207.
LEINAWEAVER, J.; SELIGMANN, Linda J. (2009). “Introduction: cultural and political economies of adoption
in Latin America”. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-19.
LOBO, Andréa (2011). “‘Making families’: child mobility and familiar organization in Cape Verde”. Vibrant (revista on-line da Associação Brasileira de Antropologia), v. 8, n. 2, p. 197-219. MARRE, D. (2009). “‘We do not have immigrant children at this school, we just have children adopted from
abroad’: flexible understandings of children’s ‘origins’”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
en España”. In: VILLALTA, Carla (coord.). Infancia, justicia y derechos humanos. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Quilmes. p. 135-162.
_____.(2010b). “Los límites del proceso de ‘emparentamiento’. ¿Cuándo un niño o niña [no] deviene en hijo o hija en la adopción transnacional en España?”. In: FONS, V.; PIELLA, A.; VALDES, M. (orgs.). Procreación, crianza y género: aproximaciones antropológicas a la parentalidad. Barcelona: PPU – Promociones y publicaciones universitarias. p. 235-260.
MARRE, Diana; BRIGGS, Laura (eds.). (2009). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
MILANICH, Nara (2009). Children of fate: childhood, class, and the State in Chile, 1850-1930. Durham: Duke University Press.
MODELL, J. S. (1994). Kinship with strangers: adoption and interpretations of kinship in American culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_____. (1998). “Rights to the children: foster care and social reproduction in Hawaii”. In: FRANKLIN, S.;
RAGONÉ, H. (orgs.). Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power, and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 156-172.
_____. (2002). A sealed and secret kinship: the culture of policies and practices in American adoption. New York: Berghahn Books.
MOTTA-MAUÈS, Maria Angelica (2004). “Na ‘casa da mãe’/Na ‘casa do pai’: anotações (de uma antropóloga e avó) em torno da ‘circulação’ de crianças”. Revista de Antropologia, São Paulo, v. 47, n. 2, p. 427-452.
MUMMERT, Gail (2010). “La crianza a distancia: representaciones de la maternidad y paternidad transnacionales en México, China, Filipinas y Ecuador”. In: FONS, V.; PIELLA, A.; VALDES, M. (orgs.). Procreación, crianza y género: aproximaciones antropológicas a la parentalidad. Barcelona: PPU – Promociones y publicaciones universitarias.
NASCIMENTO, Pedro F. G. (2011). “Blood and other substances: new reproductive technologies and adoption in popular groups in Southern Brazil”. Vibrant (revista on-line da Associação Brasileira de Antropologia), v. 8, n. 2, p. 256-278.
NOTERMANS, C. (2004). “Fosterage and the politics of marriage and kinship in East Cameroon”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
OUELLETTE, Françoise-Romaine (1995). “La part du don dans l’adoption”. Anthropologie et Sociétés, Québec, v. 19, n. 1-2, p. 157-174.
_____. (1996). “Status et identité de l’enfant dans le discours de l’adoption”. Gradhiva, Paris, n. 19, p. 63-76.
_____. (2008). “Les noms et papiers d’identite des enfants adoptes a l’etranger”. In: FINE; Agnës (ed.). Etats civils em questions: papiers, identités, sentiment de soi. Paris: CTHS.
_____. (2009). “The social temporalities of adoption and the limits of plenary adoption”. In: MARRE, D.;
BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New
York University Press. p. 375-517.
OUELLETTE, Françoise-Romaine; BELLEAU, Hélëne (2001). Family and social integration of children adopted internationally: a review of the literature. Montreal: INRS-Université du Québec.
PANTER-BRICK, Catherine; SMITH, Malcolm T. (orgs.) (2000). Abandoned children. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
PARKER, Roy (2010). Uprooted: the shipment of poor children to Canada, 1867-1917. Portland: The Policy Press.
REGUEIRO, Sabina Amantze (2010). “Análisis genético para la identificación de niños apropiados: construcción política y científica de la ‘naturaleza’ y el parentesco”. Revista de Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 18, n. 1, p.11-32.
RIBEIRO, Fernanda Bittencourt (2011). “Lealdades, silêncios e conflitos: ser um dos ‘grandes’ num abrigo para famílias”. Civitas, Porto Alegre, v. 11, n. 1, p. 40-55.
RINALDI, Alessandra de Andrade (2011). “Adoção: ato egoísta ou prática solidária?”. In: IX REUNIÃO DE
ANTROPOLOGIA DO MERCOSUL, PR GT29 Direitos humanos e ajuda humanitária: saberes, sentidos e
práticas, Curitiba, PR.
ROBERTS, D. (2002). Shattered bonds: the color of child welfare. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
SALADIN-D’ANGLURE, B. (1988). “Enfants nomades au pays des Inuit Iglulik”. Anthropologie et Sociétés, Québec, v. 12, n. 2, p. 125-166.
SAMUELS, E. (2001). “The idea of adoption: an inquiry into the history of adult adoptee access to birth records”.
Rutgers Law Review, Newark, v. 53, p. 367-437.
SCHACHTER [Modell], J. (2009). “International adoption: lessons from Hawaii”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L.(eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
SCHNEIDER, David (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
SELIGMANN, L. (2009). “The cultural and the political economies of adoption practices in Andean Peru and the
United States”. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 115-139.
SELMAN, P. (2004). “Adoption: a cure for (too) many ills?”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to _____. (2009). “The movement of children for international adoption: developments and trends in receiving States and States of origin, 1998-2004”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
SOLINGER, R. (2001). Beggars and choosers: how the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare in the United States. New York: Hill and Wang.
STACK, C. (1974). All our kin. New York: Basic Books.
STEPHENS, S. (ed.) (1995). Children and the politics of culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
STRYKER, R. (2010). The road to Evergreen: adoption, attachment therapy, and the promise of family. New York: Cornell University Press.
TARDUCCI, Monica (2011). La adopción: una aproximación desde la Antropología del parentesco. Buenos Aires: Librería de Mujeres Ed.
TERRELL, J.; MODELL, J. (1994). “Anthropology and adoption”. American Anthropologist, New Series, Arlington, v. 96, n. 1, p. 155-161.
TREIDE, D. (2004). “Adoptions in Micronesia: past and present”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
UZIEL, Ana Paula (2007). Homossexualidade e adoção. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.
VAN VLEET, K. E. (2008). Performing kinship: narrative, gender, and the intimacies of power in the Andes. Austin: University of Texas Press.
_____. (2009). “‘We had already come to love her’: adoption at the margins of the Bolivian State”. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, Arlington, v. 14, n. 1, p. 20-43.
VIANNA, Adriana (2002). Limites da menoridade: tutela, família e autoridade em julgamento. Tese de doutorado em Antropologia, Museu Nacional, PPGAS-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
VILLALTA, C. (2011). “Entregas, adopciones y dilemas en el campo de organismos destinados a la infancia”. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 19, n. 1, p. 103-123.
_____. (2012). Entregas e y secuestros: el rol des estado en la apropiación de niños. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.
VOLKMAN, T. A. (2005a). “Embodying Chinese culture: transnational adoption in North America”. In:
VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
_____. (2005b). “Introduction: New geographies of kinship”. In: VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
_____. (2009). “Seeking sisters: twinship and kinship in an age of internet miracles and DNA technologies”. In:
MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
VOUTIRA, Eftihia; BROUSKOU, Aigli (2000). “‘Borrowed children’ in the Greek civil war”. In: PANTERBRICK,
C.; SMITH, M. T. (orgs.). Abandoned children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WANG, Diana (2008). Los niños escondidos del holocausto a Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: Marea.
WARDLE, H. (2004). “Choosing parents: adoption into a global network”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
YNGVESSON, B. (1997). “Negotiating motherhood: identity and difference in ‘open’ adoptions”. Law and Society Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 31-80.
_____. (2002). “Placing the ‘Gift Child’ in transnational adoption”. Law & Society Review, Germantown, v. 36, n. 2, p. 227-256.
_____. (2004). “National bodies and the body of the child: ‘completing’ families through international adoption”. In: BOWIE, F. (ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. New York: Routledge.
_____. (2005). “Going ‘home’: adoption, loss of bearings, and the mythology of roots”. In: VOLKMAN, T. A. (ed.). Cultures of transnational adoption. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
_____. (2006). “Backed by papers: undoing persons, histories, and return”. American Ethnologist, Malden, v. 33, n. 2, p. 177-190.
_____. (2009). “Refiguring kinship in the space of adoption”. In: MARRE, D.; BRIGGS, L. (eds.). International adoption: global inequalities and the circulation of children. New York: New York University Press.
_____. (2010). Belonging in an adopted world: race, identity, and transnational adoption. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ZAMBRANO, Elizabeth et al. (2009). O direito à homoparentalidade: cartilha sobre as famílias constituídas por pais homossexuais. Porto Alegre: Instituto de Acesso à Justiça/Nupacs/Prosare (Fundação MacArthur).
ZELIZER, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child: the changing social values of children. New York: Basic Books.
