The teaching of Anthropology and the formation of anthropologists, in Brazil, today
from a primordial theme to a (possible) field of (anthropological) research
Keywords:
Anthropology teaching, Anthropology in Brazil, University formation, Teachers training, Science educationAbstract
the teaching of anthropology has been the subject of reflections since the beginning of the discipline in Brazil and has been fundamental to its institutionalization process in the country. However, despite its importance, the academic approach to the theme faces serious difficulties in terms of theoretical performance. Until the 1990s, such an interest was dependent on the production of an institutional history of anthropology, with the beginning of a series of publica-tions by the Brazilian Anthropological Association focused on the formation of anthropologists, this interest seems to respond now to the analysis of the organizational aspects of the “field of anthropology” in this context. In addition to analyzing the subordinate treatment given to the teaching of anthropology within the bibliographic production of the discipline, and indicates some challenges and paths, especially regarding the possibility of considering teaching as an object of research in its own right.
Downloads
References
ALEMÁN, E.; KELLAM, M. The Nationalization of Electoral Change in the Americas. Electoral Studies, v. 27, n.2, p. 193-212, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.005
BOCHSLER, D. Measuring party nationalization: a new Gini-based indicator that corrects for the number of units.Center for Comparative and International Studies, v. 29, n. 1, p. 155-168, 2010.
BOCHSLER, D. The nationalization of political parties: a triangle model, applied on the Central and EasternEuropean Countries. CEU Political Science Journal, v. 4, p. 6-37, 2006.
BOCHSLER, D. The puzzle of party system in Central-East Europe: Is party nationalization the key variable? In:GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 3., 2005,Budapeste. Anais […]. p. 1-36, 2005.
BORGES, A. Nacionalização partidária e estratégias eleitorais no presidencialismo de coalizão. Dados, v. 58, n. 3, p.651-688, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/00115258201555
BORGES, A. Subnational Hybrid Regimes and Democratization in Brazil: why party nationalization matters.In: BEHREND, J.; WHITEHEAD, L. (orgs.). Illiberal Practices: territorial variances within large federal democracies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2016.
BUTLER, D.; STOKES, D. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice. Virgínia: St. Martin’s Press, 1974.
CARAMANI, D. The Nationalization of Politics: the formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
CHHIBBER, P.; KOLLMAN, K. Party aggregation and the number of parties in India and the United States. The American Political Science Review, v. 92, n. 2, p. 329-342, 1998.
CHHIBBER, P.; KOLLMAN, K. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and party
competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
CLAGGETT, W.; FLANIGAN, W.; ZINGALE, N. Nationalization of the American Electorate. The American Political Science Review, v. 78, n. 1, p. 77-91, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961250
CONCEIÇÃO, B. Nacionalização partidária em marcha: processo de distanciamento dos partidos brasileiros da regionalização. Tese (Doutorado) – Departamento de Ciência Política, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2018.
CONVERSE, P. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies, v. 2, n. 2, p. 139-171, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001041406900200201
DUVERGER, M. Os Partidos Políticos. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1970.
GOLOSOV, G. Party system nationalization: the problems of measurement with an application to federal states. Party Politics, v. 22, n. 3, p. 278-288, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068814549342
JONES, M.; MAINWARING, S. The Nationalization of parties and party systems: An empirical measure and na application to Americas. Kellogg Institute Working Paper, v. 1, n. 304, p. 1-30, 2003.
KASUYA, Y.; MOENIUS, J. The nationalization of party systems: conceptual issues and alternatives district-focused measures. Electoral Studies, v. 27, n. 1, p. 126-135, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.09.004
KAWATO, M.; FURUKAWA, K.; SUZUKI, R. A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning
of voluntary movement. Biological Cybernetics, v. 57, n. 3, p. 169-185, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364149
KIRCHHEIMER, O. A transformação dos sistemas partidários da Europa Ocidental. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, n. 7, p. 349-385, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-33522012000100014
KRAUSE, S. Uma Análise Comparativa das Estratégias Eleitorais nas Eleições Majoritárias de 1994, 1998 e 2002:
Coligações Eleitorais versus Nacionalização dos Partidos e do Sistema Partidário Brasileiro. In: KRAUSE, S.;
SCHMITT, R. (orgs.). Partidos e Coligações Eleitorais no Brasil. São Paulo: Unesp/KAS, 2005.
LAWSON, K. L’ évolution des partis politiques américains. Révue Française de Science Politique, v. 42, n. 5, p. 819-834, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1992.404344
LAGO-PEÑAS, I.; LAGO-PEÑAS, S. Decentralization and nationalization of party systems. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, v. 10, n. 6, p. 1-29, 2010.
LIMA JR., O. B. Democracia e Instituições Políticas no Brasil dos anos 1980. Rio de Janeiro: Loyola, 1997.
LIMA JR., O. B. Partidos Políticos Brasileiros: A Experiência Regional e Federal (1945-64). Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1983.
LIPSET, S.; ROKKAN, S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An introduction. In: LIPSET, S.; ROKKAN, S. Party Systems and Voter Alignements: Cross National Perspectives. Nova York: Collier-MacMillan, 1967.
MAINWARING, S. Rethinking Party Systems in The Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
MEDZIHORSKY, J. Rethinking the Measurement of Party Nationalization. Budapest: Central European University, 2015.
MOENIUS, J.; KASUYA, Y. Measuring party linkage across districts: some party systems inflation indices and their properties. Party Politics, v. 10, n. 5, p. 543-564, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804045387
MORGENSTERN, S. Questions of Party Nationalization. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, 2005, Washington, D.C. Anais […]. p. 1-23, 2005.
MORGENSTERN, S.; SWINDLE, S.; CASTAGNOLA, A. Party Nationalization and Institutions. The Journal of Politics, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1322-1341, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990132
RODDEN, J.; WIBBELS, E. Dual accountability and the nationalization of party competition: evidences from four federations. Party Politics Journal, v. 17, n. 5, p. 629-653, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810376182
ROMA, C.; BRAGA, M. S. Sistema Partidário, Eleições e a Questão Federativa no Brasil. In: PINTO, C. R.; MARENCO, A. (orgs.). Partidos no Cone-Sul: Novos Ângulos de Pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung, 2002.
SANTOS, W. G. dos. A difusão parlamentar do sistema partidário: exposição do caso brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ, 2018.
SARTORI, G. Partidos y Sistemas de Partidos: marco para un análisis. Madri: Alianza Editorial, 2005.
SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Nova York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960.
STOKES, D. E. Spatial Models of Party Competition. The American Political Science Review, v. 57, n. 2, p. 368-377, 1963. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952828
VASSELAI, F. Nationalization and localism in electoral systems and party systems. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Políticas) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.
VERTZ, L.; FRENDREIS, J.; GIBSON, J. Nationalization of Electorate in the United States. The American Political Science Review, v. 81, n. 3, p. 961-966, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962686
