Elites políticas e representação
uma investigação da literatura contemporânea sobre políticos profissionais
Palavras-chave:
Representação política, Políticos profissionais, Ciência política, Cientometria, VOSviewerResumo
O tema da representação política é uma das grandes questões da ciência política. Ele engloba tanto os eleitores como as instituições representativas e os agentes que, nas democracias pluralistas, operam essas instituições: os políticos profissionais. Este artigo faz um mapa da literatura internacional sobre políticos profissionais. Foram analisados 560 artigos publicados entre 2015 e 2018 em 263 periódicos científicos indexados na plataforma Web of Science. Para entender os padrões presentes nessa literatura, utilizou-se o software de análise de redes bibliométricas VOSviewer. Analisaram- -se dois tipos de redes: coocorrência de palavras-chave a fim de identificar os temas de pesquisa recorrentes e os mais recentes; e acoplamento bibliográfico entre documentos para identificar não só comunidades nessa literatura, mas os trabalhos mais influentes. Os resultados mostraram a permanência de questões clássicas na área (interações intraelite, partidos, eleições, legislativo), mas também uma nova agenda vinculada à área de comunicação política. O trabalho de maior impacto nesse corpus é sobre políticos populistas e mídias sociais.
Downloads
Referências
ARKSEY, H.; O’MALLEY, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, v. 8, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
AROMATARIS, E.; MUNN, Z. (org.). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. [S.l.]: JBI, 2020. Disponível em: <https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BATURO, A. Cursus Honorum: Personal Background, Careers and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship—New Data and Analyses. Politics and Governance, v. 4, n. 2, p. 138, 23 jun. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.cogitatiopress.com/ojs/index.php/politicsandgovernance/article/view/602>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BAUMANN, M.; DEBUS, M.; MÜLLER, J. Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral
Legislative Studies Quarterly, v. 40, n. 2, p. 179-210, maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/lsq.12072>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BERGGREN, N.; JORDAHL, H.; POUTVAARA, P. The right look: Conservative politicians look better and voters reward it. Journal of Public Economics, v. 146, p. 79-86, fev. 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CALISE, M.; LOWI, T. J. Hyperpolitics: an interactive dictionary of political science concepts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
CALLON, M. et al. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, v. 22, n. 2, p. 191-235, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F053901883022002003
CHANG, E. C. C.; KERR, N. N. An Insider-Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians. Governance, v. 30, n. 1, p. 67-84, jan. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/gove.12193>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CLEMENTSON, D. E. Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, With a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, v. 35, n. 3, p. 247–267, 13 jun. 2016. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X15600732>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CLEMENTSON, D. E.; EVELAND JR., W. P. When Politicians Dodge Questions: An Analysis of Presidential Press Conferences and Debates. Mass Communication and Society, v. 19, n. 4, p. 411-429, jul. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15205436.2015.1120876>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
COLQUHOUN, H. L. et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 67, n. 12, p. 1291-1294, 2014. Disponível em: <http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CORBETT, J.; LIKI, A. Intersecting Identities, Divergent Views: Interpreting the Experiences of Women Politicians in the Pacific Islands. Politics & Gender, v. 11, n. 2, p. 320-344, 29 jun. 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1743923X15000057
DACOMBE, R. Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research? Political Studies Review, v. 16, n. 2, p. 148-157, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1478929916680641
EKMAN, M.; WIDHOLM, A. Politicians as Media Producers: Current trajectories in the relation between journalists and politicians in the age of social media. Journalism Practice, v. 9, n. 1, p. 78-91, 2 jan. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467
ENGESSER, S. et al. Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, n. 8, p. 1109-1126, 3 ago. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369 118X.2016.1207697>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91-108, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2009.00848.x
HASSELL, H. J. G. Party Control of Party Primaries: Party Influence in Nominations for the US Senate. Journal of Politics, v. 78, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ doi/10.1086/683072>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1086/683072
JAMES, O. et al. Citizens’ Blame of Politicians for Public Service Failure: Experimental Evidence about Blame Reduction through Delegation and Contracting. Public Administration Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 83-93, jan. 2016. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/puar.12471>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1111/puar.12471
KESSLER, M. M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, v. 14, n. 1, p. 10-25, 1963. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.5090140103>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
LEVAC, D.; COLQUHOUN, H.; O’BRIEN, K. K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, v. 5, n. 1, p. 69, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
LINDE, J.; VIS, B. Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs. Political Psychology, v. 38, n. 1, p. 101-117, fev. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ pops.12335>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12335
LIU, C. C.; SRIVASTAVA, S. B. Pulling Closer and Moving Apart: Interaction, Identity, and Influence in the US Senate, 1973 to 2009. American Sociological Review, v. 80, n. 1, p. 192-217, fev. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122414564182>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122414564182
MORASKI, B. Closed-list proportional representation in Russia. Party Politics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 381-392, 11 maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354068812473634>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068812473634
MUNN, Z. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 18, n. 1, 143, 19 dez. 2018. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
NIELSEN, P. A.; BAEKGAARD, M. Performance Information, Blame Avoidance, and Politicians’ Attitudes to Spending and Reform: Evidence from an Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 25, n. 2, p. 545-569, 1 abr. 2015. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jopart/mut051>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut051
NIELSEN, P. A.; MOYNIHAN, D. P. How Do Politicians Attribute Bureaucratic Responsibility for Performance? Negativity Bias and Interest Group Advocacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 27,
n. 2, p. 269-283, 2017. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jopart/ muw060>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw060
OPPER, S.; NEE, V.; BREHM, S. Homophily in the career mobility of China’s political elite. Social Science Research, v. 54, p. 332-352, nov. 2015. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0049089X15001593>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.007
PETERS, M. D. J. et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence- Based Healthcare, v. 13, n. 3, p. 141-146, set. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.lww.com/01787381-201509000-00005>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
PETTRICREW, M.; ROBERTS, H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. Hoboken: Blackwell, 2006.
PUENTE-DIAZ, R. Can the Same Politician Help and Hurt the Evaluations of Another Politician? The Role of Categorization on the Elicitation of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in the Mexican Political Context. Political Psychology, v. 36, n. 4, p. 469-478, ago. 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/pops.12079>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12079
ROSS, K.; FOUNTAINE, S.; COMRIE, M. Facing up to Facebook: politicians, publics and the social media(ted) turn in New Zealand. Media, Culture & Society, v. 37, n. 2, p. 251-269, 27 mar. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163443714557983>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F0163443714557983
RUSKE, R. Does Economics Make Politicians Corrupt? Empirical Evidence from the United States Congress. Kyklos, v. 68, n. 2, p. 240-254, maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/kykl.12082>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12082
SHAW, R.; EICHBAUM, C. Politicians, political advisers and the vocabulary of public service bargains: Speaking in tongues? Public Administration, v. 95, n. 2, p. 312-326, 21 jun. 2017. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/padm.12281>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1111/padm.12281
SHEFFER, L. et al. Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians. American Political Science Review, v. 112, n. 2, p. 302-321, 28 maio 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055417000569/type/journal_article>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000569
TROMBLE, R. Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New Media& Society, v. 20, n. 2, p. 676-697, 23 fev. 2018. Disponívelem:<http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444816669158>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444816669158
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.
Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523-538, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM,
D. (org.). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Basel: Springer, 2014. p. 285-320. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2007.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.15. Leiden: [s.n.], 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
WALGRAVE, S.; DEJAEGHERE, Y. Surviving Information Overload: How Elite Politicians Select Information.
Governance . 229-244, abr. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/gove.12209>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12209
