Élites politiques et représentation
recherche de la littérature contemporaine sur les hommes politiques
Mots-clés :
Représentation politique, Politiciens professionnels, Science politique, Scientométrie, VOSviewerRésumé
Le thème de la représentation politique est l’un des enjeux majeurs de la science politique. Il englobe à la fois les électeurs, les institutions représentatives et les agents qui, dans les démocraties pluralistes, font fonctionner ces institutions : les politiciens professionnels. Cet article présente la littérature internationale sur les politiciens professionnels. Nous avons analysé 560 articles publiés entre 2015 et 2018 dans 263 revues scientifiques indexées sur la base de données Web of Science. Pour comprendre les modèles présents dans la littérature, on a utilisé le logiciel d’analyse de réseau bibliométrique VOSviewer. Deux types de réseaux ont été analysés : la cooccurrence de mots-clés afin d’identifier les sujets de recherche récurrents ainsi que les plus récents; et couplage bibliographique entre les documents pour identifier à la fois les communautés et les ouvrages les plus influents. Les résultats ont montré la permanence des problématiques classiques dans le domaine (interactions intra-élites, partis politiques, élections, législatives), mais aussi un nouvel agenda lié au domaine de la Communication Politique. Les travaux qui ont plus d’impact dans ce corpus concernent les politiciens populistes et les médias sociaux.
Téléchargements
Références
ARKSEY, H.; O’MALLEY, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, v. 8, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
AROMATARIS, E.; MUNN, Z. (org.). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. [S.l.]: JBI, 2020. Disponível em: <https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BATURO, A. Cursus Honorum: Personal Background, Careers and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship—New Data and Analyses. Politics and Governance, v. 4, n. 2, p. 138, 23 jun. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.cogitatiopress.com/ojs/index.php/politicsandgovernance/article/view/602>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BAUMANN, M.; DEBUS, M.; MÜLLER, J. Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral
Legislative Studies Quarterly, v. 40, n. 2, p. 179-210, maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/lsq.12072>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
BERGGREN, N.; JORDAHL, H.; POUTVAARA, P. The right look: Conservative politicians look better and voters reward it. Journal of Public Economics, v. 146, p. 79-86, fev. 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CALISE, M.; LOWI, T. J. Hyperpolitics: an interactive dictionary of political science concepts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
CALLON, M. et al. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, v. 22, n. 2, p. 191-235, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F053901883022002003
CHANG, E. C. C.; KERR, N. N. An Insider-Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians. Governance, v. 30, n. 1, p. 67-84, jan. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/gove.12193>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CLEMENTSON, D. E. Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, With a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, v. 35, n. 3, p. 247–267, 13 jun. 2016. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X15600732>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CLEMENTSON, D. E.; EVELAND JR., W. P. When Politicians Dodge Questions: An Analysis of Presidential Press Conferences and Debates. Mass Communication and Society, v. 19, n. 4, p. 411-429, jul. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15205436.2015.1120876>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
COLQUHOUN, H. L. et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 67, n. 12, p. 1291-1294, 2014. Disponível em: <http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
CORBETT, J.; LIKI, A. Intersecting Identities, Divergent Views: Interpreting the Experiences of Women Politicians in the Pacific Islands. Politics & Gender, v. 11, n. 2, p. 320-344, 29 jun. 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1743923X15000057
DACOMBE, R. Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research? Political Studies Review, v. 16, n. 2, p. 148-157, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1478929916680641
EKMAN, M.; WIDHOLM, A. Politicians as Media Producers: Current trajectories in the relation between journalists and politicians in the age of social media. Journalism Practice, v. 9, n. 1, p. 78-91, 2 jan. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467
ENGESSER, S. et al. Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, n. 8, p. 1109-1126, 3 ago. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369 118X.2016.1207697>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91-108, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2009.00848.x
HASSELL, H. J. G. Party Control of Party Primaries: Party Influence in Nominations for the US Senate. Journal of Politics, v. 78, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ doi/10.1086/683072>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1086/683072
JAMES, O. et al. Citizens’ Blame of Politicians for Public Service Failure: Experimental Evidence about Blame Reduction through Delegation and Contracting. Public Administration Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 83-93, jan. 2016. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/puar.12471>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1111/puar.12471
KESSLER, M. M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, v. 14, n. 1, p. 10-25, 1963. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.5090140103>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
LEVAC, D.; COLQUHOUN, H.; O’BRIEN, K. K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, v. 5, n. 1, p. 69, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
LINDE, J.; VIS, B. Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs. Political Psychology, v. 38, n. 1, p. 101-117, fev. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ pops.12335>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12335
LIU, C. C.; SRIVASTAVA, S. B. Pulling Closer and Moving Apart: Interaction, Identity, and Influence in the US Senate, 1973 to 2009. American Sociological Review, v. 80, n. 1, p. 192-217, fev. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122414564182>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122414564182
MORASKI, B. Closed-list proportional representation in Russia. Party Politics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 381-392, 11 maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354068812473634>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068812473634
MUNN, Z. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 18, n. 1, 143, 19 dez. 2018. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
NIELSEN, P. A.; BAEKGAARD, M. Performance Information, Blame Avoidance, and Politicians’ Attitudes to Spending and Reform: Evidence from an Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 25, n. 2, p. 545-569, 1 abr. 2015. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jopart/mut051>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut051
NIELSEN, P. A.; MOYNIHAN, D. P. How Do Politicians Attribute Bureaucratic Responsibility for Performance? Negativity Bias and Interest Group Advocacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 27,
n. 2, p. 269-283, 2017. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jopart/ muw060>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw060
OPPER, S.; NEE, V.; BREHM, S. Homophily in the career mobility of China’s political elite. Social Science Research, v. 54, p. 332-352, nov. 2015. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0049089X15001593>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.007
PETERS, M. D. J. et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence- Based Healthcare, v. 13, n. 3, p. 141-146, set. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.lww.com/01787381-201509000-00005>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
PETTRICREW, M.; ROBERTS, H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. Hoboken: Blackwell, 2006.
PUENTE-DIAZ, R. Can the Same Politician Help and Hurt the Evaluations of Another Politician? The Role of Categorization on the Elicitation of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in the Mexican Political Context. Political Psychology, v. 36, n. 4, p. 469-478, ago. 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/pops.12079>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12079
ROSS, K.; FOUNTAINE, S.; COMRIE, M. Facing up to Facebook: politicians, publics and the social media(ted) turn in New Zealand. Media, Culture & Society, v. 37, n. 2, p. 251-269, 27 mar. 2015. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163443714557983>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F0163443714557983
RUSKE, R. Does Economics Make Politicians Corrupt? Empirical Evidence from the United States Congress. Kyklos, v. 68, n. 2, p. 240-254, maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/kykl.12082>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12082
SHAW, R.; EICHBAUM, C. Politicians, political advisers and the vocabulary of public service bargains: Speaking in tongues? Public Administration, v. 95, n. 2, p. 312-326, 21 jun. 2017. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/padm.12281>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.1111/padm.12281
SHEFFER, L. et al. Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians. American Political Science Review, v. 112, n. 2, p. 302-321, 28 maio 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055417000569/type/journal_article>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000569
TROMBLE, R. Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New Media& Society, v. 20, n. 2, p. 676-697, 23 fev. 2018. Disponívelem:<http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444816669158>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444816669158
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.
Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523-538, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM,
D. (org.). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Basel: Springer, 2014. p. 285-320. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi. org/10.10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2007.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.15. Leiden: [s.n.], 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020.
WALGRAVE, S.; DEJAEGHERE, Y. Surviving Information Overload: How Elite Politicians Select Information.
Governance . 229-244, abr. 2017. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/gove.12209>. Acesso em: 31 jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12209
