Le retour de la comparaison ethnographique
l’épistémologie dans les moments de changement politique
Mots-clés :
Ethnographie, Méthode, Comparaison, Épistémologie, Politique, Réflexivité, Sérendipité, Guerre froide, PostcolonialismeRésumé
Cette étude examine différentes approches des comparaisons ethnographiques et analyse les débats récents et anciens sur la manière de comparer les preuves ethnographiques et montre comment les épistémologies comparatives ont changé au cours de certains moments politiques (colonialisme, décolonisation et fin de la Guerre Froide). De nouvelles formes réflexives de comparaison avec des racines en épistémologie interprétative ont récemment vu le jour. La fin de la Guerre Froide a stimulé des formes de comparaison et de réflexivité qui ont donné lieu à ce que j’appelle une comparaison de sérendipité: une approche comparative basée sur une épistémologie interprétative qui considère la sérendipité, la réflexivité et la pertinence comme plus importantes que le contrôle.
Téléchargements
Références
BARRERA-GONZÁLEZ, A.; HEINTZ, M.; HOROLETS, A. European anthropologies. New York: Berghahn, 2017.
BESSIRE, L.; BOND, D. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist, Hoboken, v. 41, n. 3, p. 440-456, 2014.
BHABA, H. K. Nation and narration. London: Roudledge, 1990.
BOŠKOVIĆ, A. (Ed.). Other people’s anthropologies: ethnographic practice on the margins. New York: Berghahn, 2008.
BOŠKOVIĆ, A.; ERIKSEN, T. H. Introduction: other people’s anthropologies. In: BOŠKOVIĆ, A. (Ed.). Other people’s anthropologies: ethnographic practice on the margins. New York: Berghahn Books, 2008. p. 1-19.
BOURDIEU, P. et al. The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
BOURDIEU, P.; WACQUANT, L. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
CANDEA, M. On two modalities of comparison in social anthropology. L’Homme, Paris, v. 218, p. 183-218, 2016.
CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
CONQUERGOOD, D. Rethinking ethnography: towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, Abingdon, v. 58, n. 2, p. 179-194, 1991.
DAS, V. Wittgenstein and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, Palo Alto, v. 27, p. 171-195, 1998.
DAS, V. et al. Violence and subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
DOUGLAS, M. Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of polution and taboo. London: Routledge; Boston: Kegan Paull, 1966.
______. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge, 1994.
EMBER, M. Evidence and science in ethnography: reflections on the freeman-mead controversy. American Anthropologist, Hoboken, v. 87, n. 4, p. 906-910, 1985.
ENGLUND, H.; YARROW, T. The place of theory: rights, networks, and ethnographic comparison. Social Analysis, New York, v. 57, n. 3, p. 132-149, 2013.
FABIAN, J. Time and the other: how anthropology made its object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.
FIORAMONTI, L. Gross domestic problem: the politics behind the world’s most powerfull number. London: Zed Books, 2013.
FREEMAN, D. Margaret Mead and Samoa: the making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1983.
GEERTZ, C. The Rotating Credit Association: a “middle rung” in development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Chicago, v. 10, p. 241-263, 1962.
______. (Ed.). Old societies and new states: the quest for modernity in Asia and Africa. New York: Free Press, 1963.
______. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
______. Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
GLUCKMAN, M. The kingdom of the Zulu of South Africa. In: FORTES, M.; EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E. (Eds.). African political systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950. p. 25-55.
HACKING, I. The taming of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
HANDLER, R. The uses of incommensurability in anthropology. In: FELSKI, R.; FRIEDMAN, S. S. (Eds.). Comparison: theories, approaches, uses. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2013. p. 271-191.
HASTRUP, K. A passage to anthropology: between experience and theory. London: Routledge, 1995.
HERZFELD, M. Performing comparisons: ethnography, globetrotting, and the spaces of social knowledge. Journal of Anthropological Research, Chicago, v. 57, n. 3, p. 259-276, 2001.
HOLBRAAD, M.; PEDERSEN, M. A. Planet M: the intense abstraction of Marilyn Strathern. Anthropological Theory, Thousand Oaks, v. 9, n. 4, p. 371-394, 2009.
HOLY, L.; STUCHLICK, M. Actions, norms and representations: foundations of anthropological enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
JACKNIS, I. Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: their use of photography and film. Cultural Anthropology, Washington, v. 3, n. 2, p. 160-177, 1988.
KAPFERER, B. Introduction. In: MEINERT, L.; KAPFERER, B. (Eds.). In the event: toward an anthropology of generic moments. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015. p. 1-28.
KEESING, R. M. Book review of Marilyn Strathern, “The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia”. Pacific Studies, Laie, v. 15, n. 1, p. 129-137, 1992.
KUPER, A. Culture, identity and the project of a cosmopolitan anthropology. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, London, v. 29, n. 3, p. 537-554, 1994.
LAZAR, S. Disjunctive comparison: citizenship and trade unionism in Bolivia and Argentina. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, London, v. 18, n. 2, p. 349-368, 2012.
MARSHALL, M. The wizard from Oz meets the wicked witch of the East: Freeman, Mead, and ethnographic authority. American Ethnologist, Hoboken, v. 20, n. 3, p. 604-615, 1993.
MEAD, M.; BATESON, G. Balinese character: a photographic analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1942.
MEYER, B. Comparison as critique. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, London, v. 7, n. 1, p. 509-515, 2017.
MOL, A. A reader’s guide to the ‘ontological turn’: part 4. Somatosphere, 19 mar. 2014.
MYRHE, K. C. Introduction. Social Analysis, New York, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1-24, 2013a.
______. Membering and dismembering: the poetry and relationality of animal bodies in Kilimanjaro. Social Analysis, New York, v. 62, n. 4, p. 114-131, 2013b.
NIEHAUS, I. Kuru, aids, and witchcraft: reconfiguring culpability in Melanesia and Africa. Social Analysis, New York, v. 62, n. 4, p. 25-41, 2013.
NORDHOLT, H. S. Leadership and the limits of political control: a Balinese “response” to Clifford Geertz. Social Anthropology, Hoboken, v. 13, p. 291-307, 1993.
ORTNER, S. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Cambridge, v. 26, p. 126-166, 1984.
RODIMA-TAYLOR, D. Gathering up mutual help: relational freedoms of Tanzanian market-women. Social Analysis, New York, v. 57, n. 3, p. 76-94, 2013.
SAID, E. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon, 1978.
SPIVAK, G. C. Can the subaltern speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988.
STRATHERN, M. The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
______. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a postplural world. In: KUPER, A. (Ed.). Conceptualizing society. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 75-106.
VAN DER VEER, P. The value of comparison. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.
VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, E. Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation in Tipití. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2014.
VOKES, R. New Guinean models in the East African Highlands. Social Analysis, New York, v. 57, n. 3, p. 95-113, 2013.
