L’abordage du parti network dans l’étude des partis politiques
Mots-clés :
parti Network, Parti Élargi, Partis, Théorie des groupes, Composition partisaneRésumé
Cet article a pour but de présenter les origines et aussi de clarifier les postulats propres à l’approche du Parti network (party network). En contredisant la théorie du choix rationnel et en prenant de l’importance dans le milieu universitaire américain, principalement en fonction de ses variables explicatives part rapport à la polarisation partisane actuelle aux États-Unis, cette approche émergente contribue à une nouvelle compréhension et à de nouveaux points de vue dans les études des partis politiques, en particulier en ce qui concerne leur composition, leur organisation et leur dynamique.
Téléchargements
Références
ALDRICH, J. Why Parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
ANSOLABEHERE, S.; SNYDER, J.; STEWART, C. Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, Malden, v. 45, n. 1, p. 136-159, jan. 2001.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION. The American political science review. Toward a more responsible two party system: a report of the committee on political parties. Washington, 1950.
BAYLOR, C. First to the party: the group origins of the partisan transformation on civil rights, 1940-1960. Studies in American Political Development. Cambridge, v. 27, p. 1-31, out. 2013.
BAWN, K. et al. A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, Cambridge, v. 10, n. 3, p. 571-597, set. 2012.
BENTLEY, A. F. The governmental process: a study of social pressures. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1908.
BERNSTEIN, J. Party network research, factions, and the next agenda. STATE OF THE PARTIES CONFERENCE, Ohio, 2005. Disponível em: <http://economiceducation.us/bliss/docs/state-of-the-parties-documents/Bernstein.pdf>. Acesso em> 12 nov. 2015.
BLACK, D. On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, Chicago, v. 56, p. 23-34, 1948.
BLACK, E.; BLACK, M. Divided America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007.
BREWER, M. D.; STONECASH, J. M. Dynamics of American political parties. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
BRODER, D. The party’s over: the failure of politics in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
BURKE, E. Thoughts on the cause of the present discontents. 3. ed. London: J. Dodsley, 1899.
CANES-WRONE, B.; BRADY, D.; COGAN, J. Out of step, out of office: electoral accountability and house member’s voting. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 99, n. 1, p. 127-140, mar. 2002.
CARMINES, E.; STIMSON, J. On the structure and sequence of issue evolution. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, n. 80, p. 901-920, 1986.
______. Issue evolution: race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.
______. Beating reform: the resurgence of parties in presidential nominations, 1980 to 2000. In: American Political Science Association and Midwest Convention. Washington, 2001. Disponível em: <https://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Zaller021102/Zaller.pdf>. Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
COHEN, M. et al. The party decides: presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.
______. Spiritual Warfare. Boston: South End Press, 1989.
DIAMOND, S. Not by politics alone. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.
DOMINGUEZ, C. Groups and party coalitions: a network analysis of overlapping donor lists. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, Washington, set. de 2005. Disponível em <http://home.sandiego.edu/~caseydominguez/groupspartycoalitions.pdf> Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
DOWNS, A. Uma teoria econômica da democracia. São Paulo: Edusp, 1999.
FEINSTEIN, B.; SCHICKLER, E. Platforms and partners: the civil rights realignment reconsidered. Studies in American Political Development, Cambridge, n. 22, p. 1-31, spring 2008.
FIORINA, M. P. What happened to the medium voter? In: MIT CONFERENCE ON PARTIES AND CONGRESS, Cambridge, 1999. Disponível em: <http://www.stanford.edu/~mfiorina/Fiorina%20Web%20Files/MedianVoterPaper.pdf> Acesso em: 12 nov. 2015.
______. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pierson Longman. 2005.
______. Americans have not become more politically polarized. The Washington Post, Washington, 23 jun. 2014.
FIORINA, M, P.; ABRAMS, S. J. Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jcampbel/documents/AnnualReviewFiorina.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2015.
GREEN, J. The faith factor. Westport: Praeger, 2007.
GREEN, J.; ROZELL, M.; WILCOX, C. The values campaign? Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2007.
HEANEY, M. et al. Polarized networks: the organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates. American Behavioral Sciences. v. 56, n. 2, p. 1654-1676, 2012.
HERRING, P. Group Representation Before Congress. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1929.
______The politics of democracy: American parties in action. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1968.
HERRNSON, P. The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. The Journal of Politics, Chicago, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1207-122, out. 2009.
KAROL, D. Party position change in American politics: coalition management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
KEY, V. O. Politics, parties and pressure groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1958.
KOGER, G, MASKET, S.; NOEL, H. Partisan webs: information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge, v. 39, n. 3, p. 633-653, 2009.
LAYMAN, G. The great divide: religious and cultural conflicts in American party politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
LEVENDUSKY, M. The partisan sort. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
MANN, T. E.; ORNSTEIN, N. J. It’s even worse than it looks. New York: Basic Books, 2012.
MARTIN, W. With God on our Side. New York: Broadway Press, 1996.
MASKET, S. No middle ground: how informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2012.
______. It takes an outsider: extralegislative organization and partisanship in California. American Journal of Political Science, Malden, v. 51, n. 3, p. 482-497, jul. 2007.
MAYHEW, D. Congress: the electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
MCCARTY, N.; POOLE, K. T.; ROSENTHAL, H. Polarized America. London: The MIT Press, 2006.
MERRIAM, C. E.; GOSNELL, H. F. The American party system: an introduction to the study of political parties in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929.
NOEL, H. The coalition merchants: the ideological roots of the civil rights realignment. The Journal of Politics, Chicago, v. 74, n. 1, p. 156-173, jan. 2012a.
______. Toward a network’s theory of political parties: a social network’s analysis of internal party cleavages in presidential nominations. In: AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE CONFERENCE. Charlotesville. Setembro de 2012b. Disponível em: <http://faculty.virginia.edu/jajenkins/Noel.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2015.
NOLL, M. Religion and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
PIERSON, P.; HACKER, J. Off center: the republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
REICHLEY, J. Faith in politics. Washington: Bookings Institution Press, 2002.
SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. E. Party government. New York: Rinehart and Company, Inc., 1942.
SCHUMPETER, J. Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1961.
SCHWARTZ, M. The party network: the robust organization of Illinois republicans. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.
SINCLAIR, B. Party wars. Oklahoma: Oklahoma University Press, 2006.
SKINNER, R.; MASKET, S.; DULIO, D. 527 Committees, formal parties, and party adaptation. The Forum, Nova York, v. 11, n. 2, p. 137-156, 2013.
______. 527 Committees and the political party network. American Politics Research, Urbana-Champaign, v. 40, n. 1, p. 60-84, 2012.
STONECASH, J. M. (Ed.) New directions in American political parties. New York: Routledge, 2010.
THE FEDERALIST PAPERS. n. 9-10. 1787-1788. Disponível em <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Federalist> Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
TRUMAN, D. The governmental process: political interests and public opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968.
WILCOX, C. God’s Warriors. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1992.
