Tecendo comentários ao artigo “Redescobrindo a família rural brasileira”, de Mauro Almeida
Keywords:
rural studies, peasantry, rural family, domestic groups, peasant economyAbstract
This is a comment on the article “Rediscovering the Brazilian rural family”, published by Mauro Almeida, in 1986, in the Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais. The publication stood out at the time and, even today, remains current by questioning central notions
in the study of rural populations. Our objective was to resume the problem raised by Almeida about the multiplicity of analytical uses that the notion of rural family has, and to propose a dialogue with later academic works by the author and other Brazilian social scientists, seeking to show the current relevance of the debate.The rediscovery of the rural family proposed in the text discussed here remains an important theoretical and methodological reference for thinking about the diversity of models and forms of organization of the rural populations, and for stressing the use of grand narratives and hermetic analytical categories in the understanding of a humanity plural.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, Mauro William Barbosa de. (1993), Rubber tappers of the upper Juruá river, Brasil: The making of a forest peasantry. Tese de doutorado. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
ALMEIDA, Alfredo Wagner Berno de, (1989), “Terras de Preto, Terras de Santo e Terras de Índio: uso comum e conflito”, in CASTRO, Edna R. de; HÉBETE, Jean (org.), Na trilha dos grandes projetos: modernização e conflito na Amazônia. Belém, Cadernos do NAEA, 10.
BRUMER, Anita, (2000), “Gênero e agricultura: a situação da mulher na agricultura do Rio Grande do Sul”, in XXI Congresso Internacional da Latin America Studies Association (LASA), Miami.
CARNEIRO, Maria José, (1996), “Esposa de agricultor na França”, Revista Estudos Feministas, 4, 2:238-354.
CHAYANOV, Alexander V., (1974), La organización deIa unidad económica campesina. Buenos Aires, Ediciones Nueva Visión.
GARCIA JR., Afrânio, (1983), Terra de trabalho. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.
GODOI, Emília Pietrafesa de, (1999), O trabalho da memória: cotidiano e história no sertão do Piauí. Campinas, Editora da Unicamp.
LEACH, Edmund, (2001), Repensando a antropologia. 2a ed., São Paulo, Perspectiva.
MARCELIN, Louis Herns, (1999), “A linguagem da casa entre os negros no Recôncavo Baiano”, Mana, 5, 2:31-60.
PINA-CABRAL, João de; GODOI, Emília Pietrafesa de, (2014), “Apresentação: Dossiê Vicinalidades e Casas Partíveis”, Revista de Antropologia, 57, 2:11-21. Disponível em https://www.revistas.usp.br/ra/article/view/89105.
SAHLINS, Marshall, (2013), What kinship is... and is not. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
SAEZ, Oscar, (2013), Esse obscuro objeto de pesquisa: um manual de método, técnicas e teses em antropologia. Ilha de Santa Catarina, Ed. do Autor.
SCOTT, James C., (1976), The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven; London, Yale University Press.
SIGAUD, Lygia, (1981), “Trabalho assalariado e trabalho familiar no Nordeste”. Anuário Antropológico, 79: 181-199.
STOLCKE, Verena, (1988), Coffee Planters, Workers and Wives: Class Conflict and Gender relations on São Paulo Plantations, 1850-1980. New York, St Martin’s Press.
VAN DER PLOEG, Jan Douwe, (2016), Camponeses e a arte da agricultura: um manifesto Chayanoviano. São Paulo, UNESP; Porto Alegre: UFRGS.
WOORTMANN, Ellen F., (1995), Parentes, herdeiros e compadres: Colonos do Sul e Sitiantes do Nordeste. São Paulo, Hucitec; Brasília, UnB.
