Intergovernmental Management
evolution, theoretical frameworks and analytic perspectives
Keywords:
Federalism, Intergovernmental Management, Intergovernmental Relations, Interorganizational Networks, Cooperative Public ManagementAbstract
This study reviews the literature on intergovernmental management (IGM) with its theoretical bases and main analytical concepts. Theoretical and analytical possibilities of this concept, genesis and evolution are highlighted, as well as the advancement, varieties and challenges of IGM studies. It discusses the relationship between IGM and the approaches of federalism and intergovernmental relations (IGRs), comparing the differences and parallels between concepts. By systematizing the existing literature, this review proposes a basic conceptualization of intergovernmental management capable of summarizing the main authors of the field. Based on this definition, a specific discussion organization around three analytical perspectives is suggested: (1) federative bargaining and negotiation, (2) networks and (3) coordination studies. Thus, it contributes to the literature by systematizing a theoretical approach that is still barely used in studies on political science and public administration in Brazil.
Downloads
References
AGRANOFF, R. Local governments in multilevel systems: emergent public administration challenges. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 44, n. 4, p. 47s-62s, 2013.
______. Crossing boundaries for intergovernmental management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017.
AGRANOFF, R.; LINDSAY, V. A. Intergovernmental management: perspectives from human services problem solving at the local level. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 43, n. 3, p. 227-237, 1983.
______. Intergovernmental management: human services problem-solving in six metropolitan areas. New York: SUNY Press, 1986.
AGRANOFF, R. MCGUIRE, M. Expanding intergovernmental management’s hidden dimensions. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 29, n. 4, p. 352-369, 1999.
______. American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken,
v. 61, n. 6, p. 671-681, 2001a.
______. Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 11, n. 3, p. 295-326, 2001b.
______. inside the matrix: integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal of Public Administration, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 12, p. 1401-1422, 2003.
______. Another look at bargaining and negotiating in intergovernmental management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 14, n. 4, p. 495-512, 2004.
ANDERSON, W. Intergovernmental relations in review. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1960.
BERRY, F. S.; BROWER, R. S. Intergovernmental and intersectoral management: weaving networking, contracting out, and management roles into third party government. Public Performance & Management Review, Abingdon, v. 29, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2005.
BUNTZ, C. G.; RADIN, B. A. Managing intergovernmental conflict: the case of human services. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 43, n. 5, p. 403-410, 1983.
CLINE, K. Working relationships in the National Superfund Program: the state administrators’ perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 20, n. 1, p. 117-135, 2010.
CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. Introduction: intergovernmental management and the challenges ahead. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
COOPER, T. L.; BRYER, T. A.; MEEK, J. W. Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v, 66, p. 76-88, 2006.
ELAZAR, D. J. Exploring Federalism. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FUNG, A.; WRIGHT, E. O. Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 29, n. 1, p. 5-42, 2001.
GAGE, R. W.; MANDELL, M. P. Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks. New York: Praeger, 1990.
GRODZINS, M. The American system. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
INGRAM, H. Policy implementation through bargaining: the case of federal grants-in-aid. Public Policy, Cambridge, MA, v. 25, n. 4, p. 499-526, 1977.
KATHI, P. C.; COOPER, T. L. Democratizing the administrative State: connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 65, n. 5, p. 559-567, 2005.
KEAST, R.; BROWN, K.; MANDELL, M. Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, Abingdon, v. 10, n. 1, p. 9-33, 2007.
KINCAID, J. From cooperative to coercive federalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 509, p. 139-152, 1990.
KINCAID, J.; STENBERG, C. W. “Big Questions” about intergovernmental relations and management: who will address? Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 71, n. 2, p. 196-202, 2011.
MANDELL, M. P. Intergovernmental management in inter-organizational networks: a revised perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, Abingdon, v. 11, n. 4, p. 393-416, 1988.
MCGUIRE, M. Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 66, p. 33-43, 2006a.
______. Intergovernmental management: a view from the bottom. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks,
v. 66, n. 5, p. 677-679, 2006b.
______. Introduction: challenges of intergovernmental management. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, Baltimore, v. 36, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2013.
MCGUIRE, M.; FYALL, R. Policy energy and public management networks. Complexity, Governance & Networks, Bamberg, v. 1, n. 1, p. 39-48, 2014.
MCGUIRE, M.; LEE, D. H.; FYALL, R. The unexplainable absence of intergovernmental management research in an intergovernmental world. 2013. Paper presented at the 12th Public Management Research Conference, Madison, jun. 20-22, 2013.
OLSEN, J. P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2006.
O’TOOLE JR., L. Rational choice and policy implementation: implications for interorganizational network management. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 25, n. 1. p. 43-57, 1995.
______. treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 57, n. 1, p. 45-52, 1997.
O’TOOLE JR., L.; MEIER, K. J. Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 14, n. 4, p. 469-494, 2004.
PETERSON, P. E.; RABE, B. G.; WONG, K. K. When federalism works. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1986.
POSNER, P. L.; CONLAN, T. J. Conclusion: managing complex problems in a compound republic. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
PRESSMAN, J. L. Federal programs and city politics: the dynamics of the aid process in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
PRESSMAN, J. L.; WILDAVSKY, A. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
RADIN, B. A. Performance management and intergovernmental relations. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
ROSENTHAL, S. R. New directions for evaluating intergovernmental programs. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 44, n. 6, p. 469-476, 1984.
SABATIER, P. A. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research. In: HILL, M. (Ed.). The policy process: a reader. Newcastle: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
SCHECHTER, S. L. On the compatibility of federalism and intergovernmental management. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Oxford, v. 11, n. 2, p. 127-141, 1981.
STENBERG, C. W. Beyond the days of wine and roses: intergovernmental management in a cutback environment. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 41, n. 1, p. 10-20, 1981.
______. Block grants and devolution: a future tool? In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.) Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
______. An ACIR Perspective on intergovernmental institutional development. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 71, n. 2, p. 169-176, 2011.
STEVER, J. Intergovernmental management in a revolutionary era. In: GAGE, R. W.; MANDELL, M. P. (Eds.). Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 2, n. 3, p. 347-350, 1992.
SUNDQUIST, J.; DAVIS, D. W. Making federalism work. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1969.
THOMPSON, F. J. The rise of executive federalism: implications for the picket fence and IGM. American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 43, n. 1, p. 3-25, 2013.
WRIGHT, D. S. Intergovernmental relations: an analytical overview. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 416, n. 1, p. 1-16, 1974.
______. Understanding intergovernmental relations. Massachusetts: Duxbury Press, 1988.
______. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 50, n. 2, p. 168-78, 1990.
WRIGHT, D. S.; KRANE, D. Intergovernmental relations. In: SHAFRITZ. J. (Ed.). International encyclopedia of public policy and administration. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
WRIGHT, D. S.; STENBERG, C. W. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. In: HILDRET, W. B. et al. Handbook of Public Administration. 3. ed. Abingdon: CRC Press, 2006. p. 407-480. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2wfUX4M>. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2016.
WRIGHT, D. S.; STENBERG, C. W.; CHO, C. L. American federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, p. 1-33, 2009.