Gestão intergovernamental
evolução, abordagens teóricas e perspectivas analítica
Palavras-chave:
Federalismo, Gestão Intergovernamental, Relações Intergovernamentais, Redes Interorganizacionais, Gestão Pública ColaborativaResumo
Este trabalho apresenta um balanço da literatura de gestão intergovernamental (IGM) com suas bases teóricas e principais concepções analíticas. Destacam-se as possibilidades teóricas e analíticas deste conceito, sua gênese e evolução, assim como os avanços, vicissitudes e desafios dos estudos de IGM. Discute-se a relação entre IGM e as abordagens do federalismo e relações intergovernamentais (RIGs), observando as diferenças e paralelos entre os conceitos. Ao sistematizar a literatura existente, essa revisão propõe uma conceituação mínima de gestão intergovernamental capaz de compendiar os principais autores do campo. Partindo dessa definição, sugere-se uma organização do debate ao redor de três perspectivas analíticas: (1) barganha e negociação federativa, (2) redes e (3) estudos de coordenação. Dessa forma, contribui-se com a literatura ao sistematizar uma abordagem teórica ainda pouco utilizada nos estudos de ciência política e administração pública no Brasil.
Downloads
Referências
AGRANOFF, R. Local governments in multilevel systems: emergent public administration challenges. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 44, n. 4, p. 47s-62s, 2013.
______. Crossing boundaries for intergovernmental management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017.
AGRANOFF, R.; LINDSAY, V. A. Intergovernmental management: perspectives from human services problem solving at the local level. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 43, n. 3, p. 227-237, 1983.
______. Intergovernmental management: human services problem-solving in six metropolitan areas. New York: SUNY Press, 1986.
AGRANOFF, R. MCGUIRE, M. Expanding intergovernmental management’s hidden dimensions. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 29, n. 4, p. 352-369, 1999.
______. American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken,
v. 61, n. 6, p. 671-681, 2001a.
______. Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 11, n. 3, p. 295-326, 2001b.
______. inside the matrix: integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal of Public Administration, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 12, p. 1401-1422, 2003.
______. Another look at bargaining and negotiating in intergovernmental management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 14, n. 4, p. 495-512, 2004.
ANDERSON, W. Intergovernmental relations in review. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1960.
BERRY, F. S.; BROWER, R. S. Intergovernmental and intersectoral management: weaving networking, contracting out, and management roles into third party government. Public Performance & Management Review, Abingdon, v. 29, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2005.
BUNTZ, C. G.; RADIN, B. A. Managing intergovernmental conflict: the case of human services. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 43, n. 5, p. 403-410, 1983.
CLINE, K. Working relationships in the National Superfund Program: the state administrators’ perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 20, n. 1, p. 117-135, 2010.
CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. Introduction: intergovernmental management and the challenges ahead. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
COOPER, T. L.; BRYER, T. A.; MEEK, J. W. Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v, 66, p. 76-88, 2006.
ELAZAR, D. J. Exploring Federalism. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FUNG, A.; WRIGHT, E. O. Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 29, n. 1, p. 5-42, 2001.
GAGE, R. W.; MANDELL, M. P. Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks. New York: Praeger, 1990.
GRODZINS, M. The American system. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
INGRAM, H. Policy implementation through bargaining: the case of federal grants-in-aid. Public Policy, Cambridge, MA, v. 25, n. 4, p. 499-526, 1977.
KATHI, P. C.; COOPER, T. L. Democratizing the administrative State: connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 65, n. 5, p. 559-567, 2005.
KEAST, R.; BROWN, K.; MANDELL, M. Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, Abingdon, v. 10, n. 1, p. 9-33, 2007.
KINCAID, J. From cooperative to coercive federalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 509, p. 139-152, 1990.
KINCAID, J.; STENBERG, C. W. “Big Questions” about intergovernmental relations and management: who will address? Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 71, n. 2, p. 196-202, 2011.
MANDELL, M. P. Intergovernmental management in inter-organizational networks: a revised perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, Abingdon, v. 11, n. 4, p. 393-416, 1988.
MCGUIRE, M. Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 66, p. 33-43, 2006a.
______. Intergovernmental management: a view from the bottom. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks,
v. 66, n. 5, p. 677-679, 2006b.
______. Introduction: challenges of intergovernmental management. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, Baltimore, v. 36, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2013.
MCGUIRE, M.; FYALL, R. Policy energy and public management networks. Complexity, Governance & Networks, Bamberg, v. 1, n. 1, p. 39-48, 2014.
MCGUIRE, M.; LEE, D. H.; FYALL, R. The unexplainable absence of intergovernmental management research in an intergovernmental world. 2013. Paper presented at the 12th Public Management Research Conference, Madison, jun. 20-22, 2013.
OLSEN, J. P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2006.
O’TOOLE JR., L. Rational choice and policy implementation: implications for interorganizational network management. The American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 25, n. 1. p. 43-57, 1995.
______. treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 57, n. 1, p. 45-52, 1997.
O’TOOLE JR., L.; MEIER, K. J. Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 14, n. 4, p. 469-494, 2004.
PETERSON, P. E.; RABE, B. G.; WONG, K. K. When federalism works. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1986.
POSNER, P. L.; CONLAN, T. J. Conclusion: managing complex problems in a compound republic. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
PRESSMAN, J. L. Federal programs and city politics: the dynamics of the aid process in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
PRESSMAN, J. L.; WILDAVSKY, A. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
RADIN, B. A. Performance management and intergovernmental relations. In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.). Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
ROSENTHAL, S. R. New directions for evaluating intergovernmental programs. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 44, n. 6, p. 469-476, 1984.
SABATIER, P. A. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research. In: HILL, M. (Ed.). The policy process: a reader. Newcastle: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
SCHECHTER, S. L. On the compatibility of federalism and intergovernmental management. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Oxford, v. 11, n. 2, p. 127-141, 1981.
STENBERG, C. W. Beyond the days of wine and roses: intergovernmental management in a cutback environment. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 41, n. 1, p. 10-20, 1981.
______. Block grants and devolution: a future tool? In: CONLAN, T. J.; POSNER, P. L. (Eds.) Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
______. An ACIR Perspective on intergovernmental institutional development. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, v. 71, n. 2, p. 169-176, 2011.
STEVER, J. Intergovernmental management in a revolutionary era. In: GAGE, R. W.; MANDELL, M. P. (Eds.). Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, v. 2, n. 3, p. 347-350, 1992.
SUNDQUIST, J.; DAVIS, D. W. Making federalism work. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1969.
THOMPSON, F. J. The rise of executive federalism: implications for the picket fence and IGM. American Review of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, v. 43, n. 1, p. 3-25, 2013.
WRIGHT, D. S. Intergovernmental relations: an analytical overview. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 416, n. 1, p. 1-16, 1974.
______. Understanding intergovernmental relations. Massachusetts: Duxbury Press, 1988.
______. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 50, n. 2, p. 168-78, 1990.
WRIGHT, D. S.; KRANE, D. Intergovernmental relations. In: SHAFRITZ. J. (Ed.). International encyclopedia of public policy and administration. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
WRIGHT, D. S.; STENBERG, C. W. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. In: HILDRET, W. B. et al. Handbook of Public Administration. 3. ed. Abingdon: CRC Press, 2006. p. 407-480. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2wfUX4M>. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2016.
WRIGHT, D. S.; STENBERG, C. W.; CHO, C. L. American federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. Public Administration Review, Hoboken, p. 1-33, 2009.
