Abordagem do partido network no estudo de partidos políticos
Palavras-chave:
Partido Network, Partido Expandido, Partidos, Teoria dos Grupos, Composição PartidáriaResumo
O trabalho aqui proposto busca expor as origens e esclarecer os postulados próprios da abordagem do partido network (party network) no estudo de partidos políticos. Contrariando a teoria da Escolha Racional e ascendendo na academia norte-americana em função de suas variáveis explicativas no que diz respeito à polarização partidária atual nos Estados Unidos, essa abordagem emergente contribui para um novo entendimento e novos focos de apreensão nos estudos partidários, em especial em relação à composição, organização e dinâmicas partidárias.
Downloads
Referências
ALDRICH, J. Why Parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
ANSOLABEHERE, S.; SNYDER, J.; STEWART, C. Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, Malden, v. 45, n. 1, p. 136-159, jan. 2001.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION. The American political science review. Toward a more responsible two party system: a report of the committee on political parties. Washington, 1950.
BAYLOR, C. First to the party: the group origins of the partisan transformation on civil rights, 1940-1960. Studies in American Political Development. Cambridge, v. 27, p. 1-31, out. 2013.
BAWN, K. et al. A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, Cambridge, v. 10, n. 3, p. 571-597, set. 2012.
BENTLEY, A. F. The governmental process: a study of social pressures. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1908.
BERNSTEIN, J. Party network research, factions, and the next agenda. STATE OF THE PARTIES CONFERENCE, Ohio, 2005. Disponível em: <http://economiceducation.us/bliss/docs/state-of-the-parties-documents/Bernstein.pdf>. Acesso em> 12 nov. 2015.
BLACK, D. On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, Chicago, v. 56, p. 23-34, 1948.
BLACK, E.; BLACK, M. Divided America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007.
BREWER, M. D.; STONECASH, J. M. Dynamics of American political parties. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
BRODER, D. The party’s over: the failure of politics in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
BURKE, E. Thoughts on the cause of the present discontents. 3. ed. London: J. Dodsley, 1899.
CANES-WRONE, B.; BRADY, D.; COGAN, J. Out of step, out of office: electoral accountability and house member’s voting. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 99, n. 1, p. 127-140, mar. 2002.
CARMINES, E.; STIMSON, J. On the structure and sequence of issue evolution. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, n. 80, p. 901-920, 1986.
______. Issue evolution: race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.
______. Beating reform: the resurgence of parties in presidential nominations, 1980 to 2000. In: American Political Science Association and Midwest Convention. Washington, 2001. Disponível em: <https://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Zaller021102/Zaller.pdf>. Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
COHEN, M. et al. The party decides: presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.
______. Spiritual Warfare. Boston: South End Press, 1989.
DIAMOND, S. Not by politics alone. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.
DOMINGUEZ, C. Groups and party coalitions: a network analysis of overlapping donor lists. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, Washington, set. de 2005. Disponível em <http://home.sandiego.edu/~caseydominguez/groupspartycoalitions.pdf> Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
DOWNS, A. Uma teoria econômica da democracia. São Paulo: Edusp, 1999.
FEINSTEIN, B.; SCHICKLER, E. Platforms and partners: the civil rights realignment reconsidered. Studies in American Political Development, Cambridge, n. 22, p. 1-31, spring 2008.
FIORINA, M. P. What happened to the medium voter? In: MIT CONFERENCE ON PARTIES AND CONGRESS, Cambridge, 1999. Disponível em: <http://www.stanford.edu/~mfiorina/Fiorina%20Web%20Files/MedianVoterPaper.pdf> Acesso em: 12 nov. 2015.
______. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pierson Longman. 2005.
______. Americans have not become more politically polarized. The Washington Post, Washington, 23 jun. 2014.
FIORINA, M, P.; ABRAMS, S. J. Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jcampbel/documents/AnnualReviewFiorina.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2015.
GREEN, J. The faith factor. Westport: Praeger, 2007.
GREEN, J.; ROZELL, M.; WILCOX, C. The values campaign? Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2007.
HEANEY, M. et al. Polarized networks: the organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates. American Behavioral Sciences. v. 56, n. 2, p. 1654-1676, 2012.
HERRING, P. Group Representation Before Congress. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1929.
______The politics of democracy: American parties in action. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1968.
HERRNSON, P. The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. The Journal of Politics, Chicago, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1207-122, out. 2009.
KAROL, D. Party position change in American politics: coalition management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
KEY, V. O. Politics, parties and pressure groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1958.
KOGER, G, MASKET, S.; NOEL, H. Partisan webs: information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge, v. 39, n. 3, p. 633-653, 2009.
LAYMAN, G. The great divide: religious and cultural conflicts in American party politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
LEVENDUSKY, M. The partisan sort. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
MANN, T. E.; ORNSTEIN, N. J. It’s even worse than it looks. New York: Basic Books, 2012.
MARTIN, W. With God on our Side. New York: Broadway Press, 1996.
MASKET, S. No middle ground: how informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2012.
______. It takes an outsider: extralegislative organization and partisanship in California. American Journal of Political Science, Malden, v. 51, n. 3, p. 482-497, jul. 2007.
MAYHEW, D. Congress: the electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
MCCARTY, N.; POOLE, K. T.; ROSENTHAL, H. Polarized America. London: The MIT Press, 2006.
MERRIAM, C. E.; GOSNELL, H. F. The American party system: an introduction to the study of political parties in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929.
NOEL, H. The coalition merchants: the ideological roots of the civil rights realignment. The Journal of Politics, Chicago, v. 74, n. 1, p. 156-173, jan. 2012a.
______. Toward a network’s theory of political parties: a social network’s analysis of internal party cleavages in presidential nominations. In: AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE CONFERENCE. Charlotesville. Setembro de 2012b. Disponível em: <http://faculty.virginia.edu/jajenkins/Noel.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2015.
NOLL, M. Religion and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
PIERSON, P.; HACKER, J. Off center: the republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
REICHLEY, J. Faith in politics. Washington: Bookings Institution Press, 2002.
SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. E. Party government. New York: Rinehart and Company, Inc., 1942.
SCHUMPETER, J. Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1961.
SCHWARTZ, M. The party network: the robust organization of Illinois republicans. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.
SINCLAIR, B. Party wars. Oklahoma: Oklahoma University Press, 2006.
SKINNER, R.; MASKET, S.; DULIO, D. 527 Committees, formal parties, and party adaptation. The Forum, Nova York, v. 11, n. 2, p. 137-156, 2013.
______. 527 Committees and the political party network. American Politics Research, Urbana-Champaign, v. 40, n. 1, p. 60-84, 2012.
STONECASH, J. M. (Ed.) New directions in American political parties. New York: Routledge, 2010.
THE FEDERALIST PAPERS. n. 9-10. 1787-1788. Disponível em <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Federalist> Acesso em 12 nov. 2015.
TRUMAN, D. The governmental process: political interests and public opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968.
WILCOX, C. God’s Warriors. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1992.
