La non-violence en tant que principe et la non-violence pragmatique
Mots-clés :
Désobéissance civile, Gene Sharp, Théorie Politique, Action Non ViolenteRésumé
Cet article vise à discuter des prérogatives théoriques qui composent et soutiennent le débat actuel sur la non-violence, qui a augmenté après le succès du processus d’indépendance de l’Inde en 1947. L’objective ici est d’éclairer les auteurs qui écrivent depuis de la seconde moitié du 20e siècle afin d’étayer et justifier comme légitimes et efficaces certaines formes spécifiques de participation et résistance politiques opposées à l’usage de violence. À cette fin, on présente les distinctions normatives caractérisant la complexité de la non-violence, qui sont ensuite comparées avec certains aspects de la pensée des auteurs pertinents pour la théorie politique.
Téléchargements
Références
ARENDT, Hannah. Sobre a violência. Tradução de André Duarte. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 1994.
ATACK, Iain. Nonviolent political action and the limits of consent. Theoria, New York, v. 53, n. 111, p. 87-107, 2006.
BEISSINGER, Mark. Structure and example in modular political phenomena: the diffusion of bulldozer/rose/orange/tulip revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, Cambridge, v. 5, n. 2, p. 259-276, 2007.
BOÉTIE, Étienne de La. Discurso sobre a servidão voluntária. Tradução de Evelyn Tesche. São Paulo: Edipro, 2017.
CHENOWETH, Erica; STEPHAN, Maria. Why civil resistance works: the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
CLEMENTS, Kevin. Principled nonviolence: an imperative, not an optional extra. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, Seul, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2015.
GRAY, Stuart; HUGHES, Thomas. Gandhi’s Devotional Political Thought. Philosophy East and West, Honolulu, v. 65, n. 2, p. 375-400, 2015.
GURZA LAVALLE, Adrian; ISUNZA, Ernesto. A trama da crítica democrática: da participação à representação e à accountability. Lua Nova, São Paulo, v. 84, p. 95-139, 2011.
HOWES, Dustin. The failure of pacifism and the success of nonviolence. Perspectives on Politics, Cambridge, v. 11, n. 2, p. 427-446, 2013.
KING, Mary. Nonviolent struggle in Africa: essentials of knowledge and teaching. Africa Peace and Conflict Journal, San José, v. 1, n. 1, p. 19-44, 2008.
MARTIN, Brian. Gene Sharp’s theory of power. Journal of Peace Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 26, n. 2, p. 213-222, 1989.
MARTIN, Brian. The politics of Gene Sharp. Gandhi Marg, Nova Délhi, v. 35, n. 2, p. 201-230, 2013.
MCCARTHY, Ronald; KRUEGLER, Christopher. Toward research and theory building in the study of nonviolent action. Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution, 1993.
NAGLER, Michael. The search for a nonviolent future: a promise of peace for ourselves, our families, and our world. Makawao: Inner Ocean, 2004.
NON-VIOLENCE. In: CAMBRIDGE Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2zfTy2z. Acesso em: 28 maio 2018.
PHILLIPS, Anne. O que há de errado com a democracia liberal? Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, DF, v. 6, p. 339-363, 2011.
SCHOCK, Kurt. Nonviolent action and its misconceptions: insights for social scientists. PS, Washington, DC, v. 36, n. 4, p. 705-712, 2003.
SCHOCK, Kurt . The practice and study of civil resistance. Journal of Peace Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 50, n. 3, p. 277-290, 2013.
SHARP, Gene. Da ditadura à democracia: uma estrutura conceitual para a libertação. Tradução de José Filardo. Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution, 2010.
SHARP, Gene. The politics of nonviolent action. Boston: Porter Sargent, 2012. 3 v.
STIEHM, Judith. Nonviolence is Two. Sociological Inquiry, Hoboken, v. 38, n. 2, p. 23-30, 1968.
WEBER, Max. A política como vocação”. In: GERTH, Heinrich; MILLS, Wright (orgs.). Max Weber: ensaios de sociologia. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos, 1967. p. 55-89.
WEBER, Thomas. Nonviolence is who? Gene Sharp and Gandhi. Peace & Change, Omaha, v. 28, n. 2, p. 250-270, 2003.
YOUNG, Iris. Representação política, identidade e minorias. Lua Nova, São Paulo, v. 67, p. 139-190, 2006.
