Les institutions changent de façon endogène ?
Limites et possibilités de changement institutionnel endogène dans la Théorie Institutionnelle Contemporaine
Mots-clés :
Science politique comparée, Théorie du changement institutionnel, Nouvel institutionnalisme historique, Modèles et théories, Étude de casRésumé
Cet article analyse les innovations analytiques produites par la deuxième génération du nouvel institutionnalisme historique sur le problème du changement endogène dans la science politique comparée. L’analyse se situe dans la compréhension des alternatives proposées en vue de surmonter les frontières traditionnelles des modèles axés sur des prémisses de stabilité et de l’importance causale de facteurs exogènes. L’argument développé est le suivant : la deuxième génération de recherches a produit un ensemble de transformations analytiques et conceptuelles sensibles qui ont permis l’inclusion de nouveaux concepts, de catégories analytiques et de mécanismes de cause en vue de comprendre le changement de manière appropriée.
Téléchargements
Références
AOKI, M. Towards a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001.
______. Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes. Journal of Institutional Economics, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2009.
BARRY, B. (1996). Justice as Impartiality. New York. Oxford University Press.
BATES, R. H. et al. Analytical narratives. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998.
CAMPBELL, J. Institutional change and globalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.
CAPOCCIA, G.; KELEMEN, D. The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, v. 59, n. 3, p. 341-369, 2007.
COLEMAN, J. S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
COLLIER, D.; COLLIER, R. Shaping the political arena: critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991.
ELSTER, J. Nuts and bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
______. Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
GERRING, J. The mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science, v. 38, p. 161-179, 2007.
GERRING, J.; STROM, T. C.; ALFARO, R. Democracy and human development. Journal of Politics, v. 74, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2012.
GREIF, A.; DAVID, L. D. L. A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, v. 98, n. 4, p. 633-652, 2004.
______. Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from the medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
______. Dissecting the social: on the principles of analytical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
______. Studying mechanisms to strengthen causal inferences in quantitative research. In: BOXSTEFFENSMEIER,
J. M.; HENRY, E. B.; COLLIER, D. (Eds.). The oxford handbook of political methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 319-356.
HAINMUELLER, J.; HOPKINS, D. J.; YAMAMOTO, T. Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. MIT Political Science Department Research, 2013.
HACKER, J. S. Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment. In: STREECK, W.;
THELEN, K. (Eds.). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 40-82.
HALL, P. A.; TAYLOR, R. C. R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, v. 44, n. 5, p. 963-957, 1996.
HEDSTRÖM, P.; SWEDBERG, R. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
HELMKE, G.; LEVITSKY, S. (Eds.) Informal institutions and democracy: lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2006.
KATZNELSON, I. Periodization and preferences: reflections on purposive action in comparative historical social science. In: MAHONEY, J.; RUESCHMEYER, D. (Eds.). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 270-301.
KATZNELSON, I.; WEINGAST, B. (Eds.). Preferences and situations: points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 2005.
LIEBERMAN, E. S. Causal inference in historical institutional analysis: a specification of periodization strategies. Comparative Political Studies, v. 34, n. 9, p. 1011-1035, 2001.
LIEBERMAN, R. C. Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change. American Political Science Review, v. 96, n. 4, 2002. p. 697-712.
MAHONEY, J.; THELEN, K. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press, 1989.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
______. Understanding the process of economic change. New Jersey: Princeton Economic Press, 2005.
NORTH, D. C.; WALLIS, J. J.; WEINGAST, B. R. Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
PIERSON, P. Increasing returns, path dependency, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, v. 94, p. 251-267, 2000a.
______. The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, v. 13, n. 4, p. 475-499, 2000b.
______. (2004) Politics in time: history, institutions and social analysis. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2004.
PIERSON, P.; SKCOPOL, T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In: KATZNELSON, I.;
MILNER H. V. (Eds.). Political science: the state of the discipline. New York: W.W. Norton, 2002. p. 693-721.
PRZEWORSKI, A. Institutions matter? Government and Opposition, v. 39, n. 4, p. 527-540, 2004.
PUTNAM, R. D. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993.
RAGIN, C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
______. Fuzzy sets social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
REZENDE, F. C. Por que falham as reformas administrativas? Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2004.
______. Analytical challenges for the new institutional theories of institutional change in comparative political science. Brazilian Political Science Review, v. 3, n. 2, p. 98-126, 2009.
______. A “nova” metodologia qualitativa e as condições essenciais de demarcação entre desenhos de pesquisa na ciência política comparada. Revista Política Hoje, v. 20, n. 1, p. 218-252, 2011.
______. Da exogeneidade ao gradualismo: inovações na teoria da mudança institucional. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 27, n. 78, 2012. p. 113-130.
RIHOUX, B.; RAGIN, C. Configurational comparative methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2009.
RODRIK, D.; SUBRAMANIAN, A. The primacy of institutions (and what this does and does not mean). Finance & Development, v. 40, n. 2, p. 31-34, jun. 2003.
ROTHSTEIN, B.; TEORELL, J. What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance: an international journal of policy, administration, and institutions, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165-190, 2008.
SCHNEIDER, C. Q.; WAGEMANN, C. (2012) Set-theoretical methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Strategies for social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
STREECK, W.; THELEN, K. Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In: STREECK,
W.; THELEN, K. (Eds.). Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 1-39.
THELEN, K. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, p. 369-404, 1999.
______. Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, v. 47, n. 3, p. 471-498, 2005.
VAN EVERA, S. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.
WALTER, M. Spheres of Justice. New York. Basic Books.
