Le risque dans le cadre de la théorie sociale
quatre perspectives en discussion
Mots-clés :
Risque, Théo riesociale, IncertitudeRésumé
Il est probable que le risque soit entrain de devenir un thème central pour la modernité. Sa définition conceptuelle est loin de regrouper un consensus, soit dans les milieux scientifiques, soit par rapport au public en général. Le risque en tant qu’objet de recherche est abordé par diverses disciplines, qui présentent parfois des perspectives contradictoires ou antagonistes entre elles. Le domaine d’utilisation du risque est très diversifié et susceptible de multiples interprétations. Dans cet article, après une brève introduction de la notion de risque, nous discutons les différentes perspectives du risque dans la théorie sociale, sans pour
autant négliger les différences et les contributions des autres domaines scientifiques. Le risque peut être considéré comme une entité omniprésente dans nombreuses activités du inonde social et c’est pourquoi Son étude est d’autant plus pertinente dans lés sociétés contemporaines. Lorsque nous nous interrogeons sur «quel est le risque ?», nous vérifions que nous sommes face à une question très complexe, difficile à définir et à objectiver, où les limites et les frontières sont ambiguës, puisque son concept se traduit par plusieurs significations et connotations sociales.
Téléchargements
Références
ADAM, Barbara; VAN LOON, loost (2000), “Introduction: repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory”, in ADAM, B,; BECK, U.; VAN LOON. J. (orgs.). The risk society and beyond. Critical issues for Social Theory. London, Sage.
ADAMS, John (1995), Risk-, the policy implications of risk compensation and plural rationalities. London, UCL Press.
_____ . (2005), Big ideas-, risk. London, New Scientist.
AREOSA, João (2003), “Riscos e acidentes de trabalho: inevitável fatalidade ou gestão negligente?”. Sociedade e Trabalho, 19/20: 31-44.
_____ . (2005), “A hegemonia contemporânea dos ‘nõvos’ riscos”, in Soares, G. et al. (org.), Análise e gestão de riscos, segurança e fiabilidade, Lisboa, Salamandra.
_____ . (2007a)., “As. percepções de riscos dos trabalhadores: conhecimento ou ‘iliteracia’?”, in COLÓQUIO INTERNACIONAL DE SEGURANÇA E HIGIENE OCUPACIONAIS— SHO 2007, Guimarães. Anais... Guimarães, pp. 131-4.
_____ . (2007b), “Atitudes éompòrtamentais perante ó risco”, in CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE SEGURANÇA E HIGIENE N O TRABALHO 2007, Porto. Anais... Porto.
_____ . (2007c), “As. percepções de riscos num serviço de imagiologia hospitalar”, m SOARES., G. et al. (orgs.). Riscos, públicos e industriais. Lisboa, Salamandra.
______, (2QÕ8), “Risco e análise de riscos: contributos para a sua conceptualização”, in COLÓQUIO INTERNACIONAL DE SEGURANÇA E HIGIENE OCUPACIONAIS- SHO 2008, Guimarães. Anais... Guimarães, pp. 45-50.
_____ . (2009), “Organizações de alta fiabilidade: que limites para a segurança?”, in Soares, G. et al. (orgs.). Riscos industriais e emergentes. Lisboa, Saiamandra,
BECK, Ulrich (1992), Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London, Sage.
_____ . (1999), World risk society. Cambridge, Polity Press.
_____ . (2002), “O Estado cosmopolita - Para uma utopia realista”. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15 tev. 2006.
BECK, Ulrich; GIDDENS, Anthony; LASH, Scott (2000), Modernização reflexiva: política, tradição e estética na ordem social moderna. Oeiras, Celta.
CASTEL, Robert (1991), “From dangerousness to risk”, in BURCHELL, G.; GORDON, C.;
MILLER, R (orgs.). The Foucault effect. Studies in govemmenrality with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
DEAN, Mitchell (1999), “Risk, calculable and incalculable”, in LUPTON, D. (org.). Risk and Socioadtural Theory, new directions and perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
DOUGLAS, Mary (1985), Risk acceptability according to the Social Sciences. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
DOUGLAS, Mary; WILDAVSKY, Aaron (1982), Risk and culture-, an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley CA, University of California Press.
ELLIOTT, Anthony (2002), “Becks Sociology of Risk: a critical assessment”. Sociology, 36: 293-315.
EWALD, Francois ( 1991 ), “Insurance and risk”, in BURCHELL, G.; G ORDON, C.;
MILLER, P. (orgs.). The Foucault effect. Studies in governmental]ty with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
______. (1993), Foucault, a norma e o direito. Lisboa, Vega. FISCHflOFF, Baruch; WATSON, Stephen; HOPE, Chris (1984), “Defining risk”. Policy Sciences, 17: 123-39- FOUCAULT, Michel (1975), Vigiar epunir. Petrópolis, Vozes.
______. (1979), Microfisica do poder. Rio de Janeiro, Graal. GIDDENS, Anthony (1994), Modernidade e identidade pessoal. Oeiras, Celta.
_____ . (1998),j4s consequências da modernidade. Oeiras, Celta.
______. (2000), O mundo na era da globalização. Lisboa, Presença.
HANNIGAN, John (1995), Sociologia ambiental, a formação de uma perspectiva social. Lisboa, Piaget Editora.
JEFFCOTT, Michèle (2004), Investigating the perception of technological incidents-, a case study in the application of psychometric techniques to understand risk perceptions toward obstetric technology within the UK National Health Service. Tese de doutorado. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Escócia.
KRIMSKY, Sheldon (1992), “The role of theory in risk studies”, in KRIMSKY, S.; GOLDING,
D. (orgs.). Social theories o f risk. Westport CT, Praeger.
LAGADEC, Patrick (1981), La civilisation du risque-, catastrophes tecnologiqu.es et responsabilité sociale. Pans, Seuil.
LASH, Scott (2000), “Risk Culture”, in ADAM, B.; BECK, U ; VAN LOON, J. (orgs.). The risk society and beyond. Critical issues for Social Theory. London, Sage.
LOEW ENSTEIN, George et al. (2001), “Risk as feelings”. Psychological Bidletin, 127: 267-86.
LUHMANN, Niklas (1993)i Risk: a sociological theory. New York, Aldine de Gruyter.
_____ . (2001), A improbabilidade da comunicação. Lisboa, Vega.
LUPTON, Deborah (1999), “Introdution: risk and sociocultural theory”, in LUPTON, D. (org.). Risk and Sociocultural theory, new directions and perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MORAES, Thiago; NASCIMENTO, Maria (2002), "Da norma ao risco: transformações na produção de subjetividades contemporâneas”. Psicologia, em Estudo, 1: 91-102.
PERRO W, Charles (1999), Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
REASON, James (1997), Managing rhe risks of organizacional accidents. England, Ashgare.
RENN, Ortwin (1992), '‘Concepts of risk: a classification”, in KRIMSKY, S.; GOLDING, D. (orgs.). Social theories of risk. Westport CT, Praeger.
RENN, Ortwin et at. (1992), “The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical applications”. Journal ofSocial Issues, 48: 137-60.
THOM PSON, Michael; WILDAVSKY, Aaron (1982), “A proposal to create a cultural theory of risk”, in KUNREUTHER, H. C.; LEY, E. V. (orgs.). The risk analysis controversy - an institutional perspective. Berlin, Springer.
TURNER, Barry: PIDGEON, Nick (1997), Man-made disaster. Oxford, Butcerworth- Heinemann.
WEINSTEIN, Neil (1980), “Unrealistic optimism about future life events". Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39: 806-20.
WILDAVSKY, Aaron (1979), “No risk is the highest risk of all”. American Scientist, 67: 32-7.
