Global Public Goods
between multilateral diplomacy and national sovereignty
Keywords:
Global Public Goods, National Sovereignty, International Organizations, World System, MultilateralismAbstract
The concept of global public goods started to be used in the 1980’s, in the context of globalization and the discussion of the growing interdependency among countries in solving problems no longer liable to be dealt with at the national level. According to several authors revisited in this article, the concept of global public goods is especially valuable in terms of providing answers to the challenges involved in this new situation. Such literature discusses the existence of a global public domain beyond the particular interests of national states, consequently requiring that public goods be subjected to international negotiations once their provision is no longer possible or efficient at a national level. An effort to justify the use of this concept from a theoretical point of view is made in the article, as well as is provided an intent to highlight its value compared to the traditional debate on multilateralism. Concrete cases were used to analyze its practical application.Downloads
References
BARRETT, S. Why cooperate? The incentive so supply Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
BEIRÃO, A. P.; PERREIRA, A. C. A. (Orgs.) Reflexões sobre a Convenção do Direito do Mar. Brasília: Funag, 2014.
CINTRA, M. A. M.; SCHUTTE, G. R; VIANA, A. R. Globalização para todos: taxação solidária sobre os fluxos financeiros internacionais. Brasília: Ipea, 2010.
CLAUDE JR., I. L. Swords into plowshares: the problems and progress of international organization. New York: Random House, 1964.
FIORI, J. L. O poder global. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2007.
FONSECA JR., G. O interesse e a regra: ensaios sobre o multilateralismo. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2008.
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA. Globalizar a solidariedade em defesa da taxação de fluxos financeiros: relatório do Comitê Internacional de Peritos para a Força-Tarefa sobre Transações Financeiras Internacionais para o Desenvolvimento. Brasília: IPEA, 2011.
______. Inserção Internacional brasileira: temas de política externa. Brasília: IPEA, 2010.
KAUL, I. A hora dos bens públicos globais. Biblioteca Diplô, jun. 2000. Disponível em: <http://diplo.org.br/imprima1760>. Acesso em: 20 janeiro 2015.
______. Global Public Goods and responsible sovereignty. The Broker, n. 20, 2010. Special Report.
______. Global Public Goods: a concept for framing the post-2015 agenda? In: OECD/DAC DEVELOPMENT DEBATE, 7., oct. 2012, Paris. Background note… Paris, October 2012.
______. Global Public Goods: explaining underprovision and correcting for it. 2011. Paper Outline. Não publicado.
KAUL, I. et al. (Orgs.) Providing Global Public Goods: managing globalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
LANDAU, J. P. Remarks on the agenda of innovative finance. In: CONFERENCE OF THE LEADING GROUP ON SOLIDARITY LEVIES TO FUND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, Oslo. Disponível em: <http://www.innovativefinance-oslo.no/pop.cfm?FuseAction=Doc&pAction=View&pDocumentId=11748>. Acesso em: 20 de janeiro de 2015.
LEMOS, L. A.; ROMANELLI, M. Royalties e a Amazônia Azul. Valor Econômico, 7 jul. 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.valor.com.br/arquivo/834573/royalties-e-amazonia-azul>. Acesso em: 9 de julho de 2010.
NYE, J. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs, 2011.
OLIVEIRA, M. F. Alianças e coalizões internacionais do governo Lula: o Ibas e o G-20. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 8, n. 2, p. 55-69, 2005.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. A more secure world: our shared responsibility: Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. New York: ONU, 2004. U.N. Doc. A/59/565.
______. In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: ONU, 2005. U.N. Doc. A/59/2005.
RODRIGUES, G. M. A. A Amazônia como foco da integração: a convergência entre a Unasul e a OTCA. Extraprensa (USP), ano VII, n. 13, p.54-p.61, 2013.
RODRIK, D. Economistas e democracia. Valor Econômico. Opinião. 23 maio 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.valor.com.br/arquivo/889031/economistas-e-democracia>. Acesso em: [23 de maio de 2011].
______. Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1997.
ROUSSEFF, D. Brazil will fight back against the currency manipulators. Financial Times, 21 set. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8871a370-e2aa-11e0-897a-00144feabdc0.html>. Acesso em: [10 de outubro de 2011].
RUGGIE, J. (Ed.) Multilateralism Matters. Nova York: Colombia University Press, 1993.
SAMUELSON, P. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 36, n. 4, p. 387-389, nov. 1954.
SANDLER, T. Global collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
SMITH, A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. 2 v. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.
TRINDADE, A. A. C. (Org.) A nova dimensão do Direito Internacional Público. Brasília: Instituto Rio Branco, 2003.
UNITED NATIONS. Convention on the Law of the Sea. 1982. Disponível em: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm Acessado 17 de julho de 2010.
